XPost: alt.startrek, alt.tv.star-trek, alt.tv.star-trek.enterprise   
   From: sureshot@pcwranglers.com   
      
   David Johnston wrote:   
   >   
   > ToolPackinMama wrote:   
   >   
   > > > I think there is a subtle difference.  The prime directive would   
   > > > still forbid further damage, like showing them transporters and phasors.   
   > > > But as far as guns go - the damage has been done, there is nothing   
   > > > natural to protect anymore.   
   > >   
   > > Remember too that the Klingons were bound by a treaty agreement, but NOT   
   > > by the Prime Directive.   
   >   
   > So then the Federation writes off the planet and lets the Klingons   
   > take it over?  Fat bloody chance.   
      
   No, of course not.  I guess you missed my post about how I thought it   
   WOULD play out.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)