XPost: alt.startrek, alt.tv.star-trek, alt.tv.star-trek.enterprise   
   From: navamske@myway.com   
      
   On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 05:29:36 GMT, cwayne@nmia.com (Chris Wayne) had   
   this to say:   
      
   >On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 04:23:59 GMT, Eric Newman    
   >wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 20:46:15 -0600, The Merry Piper   
   >> had this to say:   
   >>   
   >>>On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 09:51:20 +1100, ®Matthew-The Resurrected©   
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>If all the little geeks stop their crying the show will last.   
   >>>>It's far better than the Next Retardation and Deep Sleep Nine.   
   >>>   
   >>>I was a lukewarm fan of TNG but I thought DS9 was a fine show.   
   >>   
   >>I thought DS9 was dreary. Klingon politics, Bajoran nuns, Ferengi   
   >>popes... not interesting.   
   >   
   >I must add that DS9 was and is the better of the sequel series.   
   >Enterprise can be as good, there is so much material for it to pull   
   >from and different formats to play with.   
   >   
   >Dreary?!  Klingon Politics, Kais (sp?) and Grand Nagusi (??) and a   
   >Founder or two :-)  All this intrigue is what made it exciting!!!  I   
   >guess you dodn't get the excitement of the world events going on IRL?   
      
      
   Main Entry: non se-qui-tur   
   Function: noun   
   Etymology: Latin, it does not follow   
   1 : an inference that does not follow from the premises; specifically   
   : a fallacy resulting from a simple conversion of a universal   
   affirmative proposition or from the transposition of a condition and   
   its consequent   
   2 : a statement (as a response) that does not follow logically from   
   anything previously said   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)