XPost: alt.startrek, alt.tv.star-trek, alt.tv.star-trek.enterprise   
   From: jrlaredo621@insightbb.com   
      
   "Straker"  wrote in message   
   news:290320051759076445%sky.diver@moonbase.alpha...   
   > In article , J R Laredo   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   >> Good, shows that someone at Paramount was thinking.  The characters are   
   >> not   
   >> the same age, and wouldn't have been all at the Academy at the same time.   
   >> It would have been as stupid as the recent decision with the X-Men   
   >> reimagined cartoon which made all the mutants, save Xavier, Magneto, and   
   >> Logan, about the same age, give or take 5 years.   
   >   
   > That might be a little more correct. The original X-Men (Cyclops,   
   > Beast, Iceman, Angel and Marvel Girl) were roughly the same age. I'm   
   > not thrilled with the cradle-robbing Jean Grey in the movies. Is there   
   > any reason they couldn't have found a young girl to play Jean? Or a   
   > 30-something guy to play Scott? That young pup they did hire has been   
   > pretty colorless as Cyclops. I don't remember anything about him. Then   
   > again, I don't remember much about either movie. Lots of sound and   
   > fury, signifying little.   
      
   I was talking about the cartoon, X-Men Evolution.  Just about every mutant   
   in the world was between the ages of 13 and 18, not just the members of the   
   X-Men.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)