home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.arts.startrek      More Star Trek weirdo fan worship      3,801 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 3,620 of 3,801   
   Jaxtraw to Andrew   
   Re: [NEWS] - The Movie's Star Trek. Peri   
   09 Mar 07 20:50:14   
   
   XPost: alt.startrek, alt.tv.star-trek.ds9, alt.tv.star-trek.next-gen   
   XPost: alt.tv.star-trek.tos, alt.tv.star-trek.voyager, alt.startrek   
   XPost: alt.tv.star-trek, alt.tv.star-trek.enterprise   
   From: jax@knickersjaxtrawstudios.com   
      
   Andrew wrote:   
   > "Stan Jensen"  wrote in message   
   > news:col2v2t6tnpl441ufciva1bafplpbqogqp@4ax.com...   
   >> The Movie's Star Trek. Period.   
   >>   
   >> Alex Kurtzman and Robert Orci, who are writing the 11th Star Trek   
   >> movie, revealed a few key points about the top-secret script in an   
   >> interview with MTV.com. Among the revelations: The movie will be   
   >> titled, simply, Star Trek; it will take place aboard a starship; and   
   >> they're OK with Matt Damon playing Capt. James T. Kirk.   
   >>   
   >> Not that the writers confirmed that Damon had been cast, as rumored.   
   >> "I'm the hugest Matt Damon fan ever," Kurtzman told the site. "If he   
   >> became [Kirk], great."   
   >>   
   >> Paramount has given a green light to Star Trek, with Lost co-creator   
   >> J.J. Abrams directing, with an eye to a Christmas 2008 release.   
   >>   
   >> As for the title, Orci said: It's Star Trek. "That's the intended   
   >> title," he said. "I don't think we want to put any colons or anything   
   >> on it."   
   >>   
   >> The writers wouldn't discuss details of the story, other than to say   
   >> it is a reimagining of the franchise that will remain true to its   
   >> history, but aim for the broadest audience possible. Kurtzman   
   >> promised: "There will be more action in this movie than any Trek   
   >> that's preceded it."   
   >   
   >> Orci added: "I don't know how you make Star Trek without a starship.   
   >> You have to trek through the stars, so you need a ship for that.   
   >> There, you got something out of us!"   
   >   
   > Wasn't "Enterprise" suppose to do the same thing ("stay true to it's   
   > history but aim for the broadest audience possible")   
      
   We can''t really compare that with this new project since we haven't seen   
   the new one, nor do we know anything about it. Enterprise singularly failed   
   to come close to that stated aspiration, except to some extent in its last   
   season. Everything was wrong about it from the get-go.   
      
      
   Ian   
      
   --   
   www.jaxtrawstudios.com   
   science fiction comics with shagging in   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca