XPost: alt.startrek, alt.tv.star-trek.enterprise, rec.arts.startrek.current   
   From: liam@valentijn.nu   
      
   "seon ferguson"  schreef in bericht   
   news:46ac5f9f$0$31420$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...   
   >   
   > "Anybody"  wrote in message   
   > news:290720071446259736%anybody@anywhere-anytime.com...   
   >> In article , "Dough"   
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> "Anybody"  wrote in message   
   >>> news:290720071015215706%anybody@anywhere-anytime.com...   
   >>> > In article <5tima3ldlosl8h16lpu1dtb7slfn5jbi0r@4ax.com>, Brian Thorn   
   >>> >  wrote:   
   >>> >   
   >>> >> On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 18:03:34 +1000, "seon ferguson"   
   >>> >>  wrote:   
   >>> >>   
   >>> >> >Most prequals are rubbish. Just look at Star Wars episode 1-3.   
   >>> >>   
   >>> >> Ugh! Do I HAVE to?   
   >>> >>   
   >>> >> But I really liked "BATMAN BEGINS".   
   >>> >   
   >>> > One word:  "Enterprise".   X-(   
   >>>   
   >>> Then again, two more words: "Season Four"   
   >>   
   >> Ah, so you think they could make 50+ awful movies and THEN get it right   
   >> (supposedly). Star Trek would be completely dead long before they got   
   >> to that point, even if you counted the last few TNG movies in the awful   
   >> category.   
   >   
   > They weren't all awful. I enjoyed nemesis and first contact.   
   >   
   > Plus keep in mind if you want to "re vamp" Trek you don't have to make a   
   > prequal.   
   >   
      
      
   They could call it a Star Trek 2.0 or something like that.   
   Borrowing from JMS's  proposal.   
      
   --   
   Wouter Valentijn   
      
   www.wouter.cc   
   www.nksf.nl   
   http://www.nksf.scifics.com/Nom20072008.html   
   www.zeppodunsel.nl   
   liam=mail   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)