XPost: alt.startrek, alt.tv.star-trek.enterprise, rec.arts.startrek.current   
   From: seon@iinet.net.au   
      
   "Wouter Valentijn"  wrote in message   
   news:46ac7c63$0$245$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...   
   >   
   > "seon ferguson"  schreef in bericht   
   > news:46ac5f9f$0$31420$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...   
   >>   
   >> "Anybody"  wrote in message   
   >> news:290720071446259736%anybody@anywhere-anytime.com...   
   >>> In article , "Dough"   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> "Anybody"  wrote in message   
   >>>> news:290720071015215706%anybody@anywhere-anytime.com...   
   >>>> > In article <5tima3ldlosl8h16lpu1dtb7slfn5jbi0r@4ax.com>, Brian Thorn   
   >>>> >  wrote:   
   >>>> >   
   >>>> >> On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 18:03:34 +1000, "seon ferguson"   
   >>>> >>  wrote:   
   >>>> >>   
   >>>> >> >Most prequals are rubbish. Just look at Star Wars episode 1-3.   
   >>>> >>   
   >>>> >> Ugh! Do I HAVE to?   
   >>>> >>   
   >>>> >> But I really liked "BATMAN BEGINS".   
   >>>> >   
   >>>> > One word:  "Enterprise".   X-(   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Then again, two more words: "Season Four"   
   >>>   
   >>> Ah, so you think they could make 50+ awful movies and THEN get it right   
   >>> (supposedly). Star Trek would be completely dead long before they got   
   >>> to that point, even if you counted the last few TNG movies in the awful   
   >>> category.   
   >>   
   >> They weren't all awful. I enjoyed nemesis and first contact.   
   >>   
   >> Plus keep in mind if you want to "re vamp" Trek you don't have to make a   
   >> prequal.   
   >>   
   >   
   >   
   > They could call it a Star Trek 2.0 or something like that.   
   > Borrowing from JMS's  proposal.   
   >   
   Nah Shattner is the only person I see as playing Captain Kirk.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)