XPost: alt.startrek, alt.tv.star-trek.enterprise, rec.arts.startrek.current
From: seon@iinet.net.au
"Wouter Valentijn" wrote in message
news:46adc29f$0$238$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
>
> "seon ferguson" schreef in bericht
> news:46adbf36$0$31411$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>>
>> "Wouter Valentijn" wrote in message
>> news:46ac7c63$0$245$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
>>>
>>> "seon ferguson" schreef in bericht
>>> news:46ac5f9f$0$31420$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>>>>
>>>> "Anybody" wrote in message
>>>> news:290720071446259736%anybody@anywhere-anytime.com...
>>>>> In article , "Dough"
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Anybody" wrote in message
>>>>>> news:290720071015215706%anybody@anywhere-anytime.com...
>>>>>> > In article <5tima3ldlosl8h16lpu1dtb7slfn5jbi0r@4ax.com>, Brian
>>>>>> > Thorn
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >> On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 18:03:34 +1000, "seon ferguson"
>>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> >Most prequals are rubbish. Just look at Star Wars episode 1-3.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Ugh! Do I HAVE to?
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> But I really liked "BATMAN BEGINS".
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > One word: "Enterprise". X-(
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then again, two more words: "Season Four"
>>>>>
>>>>> Ah, so you think they could make 50+ awful movies and THEN get it
>>>>> right
>>>>> (supposedly). Star Trek would be completely dead long before they got
>>>>> to that point, even if you counted the last few TNG movies in the
>>>>> awful
>>>>> category.
>>>>
>>>> They weren't all awful. I enjoyed nemesis and first contact.
>>>>
>>>> Plus keep in mind if you want to "re vamp" Trek you don't have to make
>>>> a prequal.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> They could call it a Star Trek 2.0 or something like that.
>>> Borrowing from JMS's proposal.
>>>
>> Nah Shattner is the only person I see as playing Captain Kirk.
>>
>
> In the first and original and best Star Trek.
>
Agreed.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
