e026246e   
   XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.startrek.current   
   From: david@block.net   
      
   On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:53:27 -0700 (PDT), Mbruno    
   wrote:   
      
   >On 9 set, 14:54, A Watcher  wrote:   
   >   
   >>   
   >> You evidently haven't seen the movie or missed a main point.  The   
   >> villain traveled back in time to before Kirk was born and his actions   
   >> changed everything from that point on.  The TV series and all prior   
   >> movies are in a different timeline.   
   >   
   >When the "new" Enterprise destroyed the "Romulan" vessel, why wasn't   
   >the alternate timeline erased ?   
      
   Why would it be?   
      
   >   
   >Moreover, the accident that caused the destruction of Romulus actually   
   >happened before the Romulan vessel traveled back in time and,   
   >therefore, was not caused by any external tampering with the timeline.   
   >Since no such explosion of Romulus has ever been mentioned in the   
   >normal ST continuity, how do you explain the inconsistency ?   
      
   It happened after all of the events in normal ST continuity.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)