XPost: ott.jobs, rec.games.roguelike.angband
From: t0r-min.osu_s@gmail.com
On 09/07/2012 9:21 PM, "Hydra-Blanky", an obvious murphy sock, wrote:
NaN> Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc,ott.jobs,rec.games.roguelike.angband
NaN> paul (seamus) wanked extraordinarily
vigorously in:
NaN>
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy? Suffering from reading
comprehension problems as well, murphy? Wally wrote that post, murphy,
not some "paul (seamus)", and Wally's email address is
hparsons@usa.net.nospam.invalid, not nad318b404@gmail.invalid. And who
is "paul (seamus)", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
alias.
NaN> oH Dear paul.kook
Who is "paul", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias.
NaN> at it again with the self harm?
What does your unsubstantiated claim regarding Wally have to do with
Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN you naughty naughty wee poppett!
Who is "you naughty naughty wee poppett", murphy? There is nobody in
this newsgroup using that alias.
NaN> .. a present for you, something you left, hurriedly.
What does your alleged present for Wally have to do with Star Trek,
jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> my two bits follows.
What do your two bits have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> ~enjoy!
What does your directive to Wally have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or
Angband, murphy?
NaN>
What does your amusement have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband,
murphy?
NaN> > Your failure to respond to the substance of my post is noted, kook.
Wally didn't write that, murphy, yet you quoted it anyway in your
response to his post. Classic dishonesty on your part, murphy.
NaN> translation: waaaaaah waaaaaaaaaaaaaaah waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaHHH
What does your bad translation have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or
Angband, murphy?
NaN> [pops dummy in gob of "nad318b404@gmail.invalid"]
What does your gibberish have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband,
murphy?
NaN> > Particularly noteworthy is your snipping and ignoring the whole
bit where
NaN> > you got the name of my news client wrong. And pretty much everything
NaN> > else.
Wally didn't write that, murphy, yet you quoted it anyway in your
response to his post. Classic dishonesty on your part, murphy.
NaN> translation: mommy waaaaaah...!!..my diaper is full.
What does your bad translation have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or
Angband, murphy?
NaN> [hands the dweeb a bunch of green thistle]
Who is "the dweeb", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
alias.
NaN> wipe your own ass.
What does your unsubstantiated insinuation that Wally doesn't have to do
with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> Message-ID:
What does that have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> > And then invoking a rule you just made up to claim "VICTOLLY!!1!!!
Wally didn't write that, murphy, yet you quoted it anyway in your
response to his post. Classic dishonesty on your part, murphy.
NaN> "VICTOLLY!!1!!!"[sic] nonetheless the thread sure reads as being you,
NaN> in your kook[i]ness, being well reamed a new asshole!
What does your ironic and unsubstantiated allegation about Wally have to
do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> PML
What is "PML", murphy, and what does it have to do with Star Trek, jobs,
or Angband?
NaN> .. actually the man paraphrased, the full rule being;
NaN>
NaN> "As the kook moves toward meltdown, the probability of a directive of
NaN> "dance kook dance" being put to the kookologist engaged in burning
NaN> the kook's ass approaches 1."
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy? There is no such documented
rule, murphy.
NaN> > I am starting to wonder /slap
Wally didn't write that, murphy, yet you quoted it anyway in your
response to his post. Classic dishonesty on your part, murphy.
NaN> .. always brings you undone, those hallucinations.
What does your ironic and unsubstantiated allegation about Wally have to
do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> take some shroom tea, lad...there's a good mommy's boy.
Who is "lad", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias.
NaN> > Of course, the normal act after inventing a rule and then using
it to
NaN> > claim victory is to then disappear for a while, or nymshift
competently
NaN> > enough not to instantly get outed.
Wally didn't write that, murphy, yet you quoted it anyway in your
response to his post. Classic dishonesty on your part, murphy.
NaN> oH ReaLLY...oh My fuCking g0d my fucking caps loCK is Broken AgaiN!
What do your foul language and your "caps loCK" have to do with Star
Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> "mmmmmmuuurphy" anyone?
What does your non sequitur question have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or
Angband, murphy?
NaN> > I am guessing that you will do neither, thus cementing your claim to
NaN> > the coveted July 2012 CNoTM Award.
Wally didn't write that, murphy, yet you quoted it anyway in your
response to his post. Classic dishonesty on your part, murphy.
NaN> .. there you go again with that "I guess" = "it i s fact" routine you
NaN> are so well known for, paul. kook
Who is "paul", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias.
NaN> two problems I read with your "guess" statement.
What does your hallucination have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or
Angband, murphy?
NaN> 1. --> Message-ID: says
NaN> your nomination of "Murphy/phlatArse/Flash/etc."
NaN> has been denied, being a "revenge nomination".
What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with Star
Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy? Even were any decree emerging from the
cesspit that is databasix.com to ever be taken seriously, Wally didn't
nominate you for anything, murphy. All he did was post a question in
rec.games.roguelike.angband to which you inexplicably responded, a whole
month later, with a large wad of screed.
NaN> you do understand what that deny message is?
What does your irrelevant question have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or
Angband, murphy?
NaN> no, never would you think that far ahead.
What does your unsubstantiated claim about Wally have to do with Star
Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> effectively the FNVW is decreeing your kook status, for only known
kooks
NaN> are denied nominating rights.
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy? Nowhere in the post you
referenced does the (fake) FNVW even mention Wally, murphy.
NaN> you, paul, being an award winning kook have
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
