home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.arts.startrek.misc      General discussions of Star Trek      11,202 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 10,372 of 11,202   
   anim8rFSK to moviePig   
   Re: Alice Eve lingerie in 'Star Trek' mi   
   24 May 13 07:24:04   
   
   61bd41fc   
   XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.movies.current-films   
   From: anim8rfsk@cox.net   
      
   In article   
   <431e7186-20d6-49ec-b7b1-37372d967d93@dl10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,   
    moviePig  wrote:   
      
   > On May 23, 7:21 am, Ubiquitous  wrote:   
   > > By John Horn   
   > >   
   > > Itıs one of the strangest scenes in ³Star Trek Into Darkness²: With no   
   > > explanation or motivation, USS Enterprise visitor Carol (Alice Eve)   
   > > strips down to her blue underwear, whereupon James T. Kirk (Chris Pine)   
   > > sneaks a peek.   
   > >   
   > > Now, Damon Lindelof, who co-wrote the filmıs screenplay, is apologizing   
   > > for the gratuitous sequence ‹ sort of.   
   > >   
   > > In an email interview with MTV, Lindelof was asked why the ³Men in Black   
   > > III² actress was obligated to show off her ripped body.   
   > >   
   > > ³Why is Alice Eve in her underwear, gratuitously and unnecessarily,   
   > > without any real effort made as to why in God's name she would undress in   
   > > that circumstance? Well, there's a very good answer for that. But I'm not   
   > > telling you what it is. Because... uh... MYSTERY?,² Lindelof wrote.   
   > >   
   > > He said there was a scene written for Khan (Benedict Cumberbatch) to   
   > > remove his shirt, but ³I donıt think it ever got shot. You know why?   
   > > Because getting actors to take their clothes off is DEMEANING AND   
   > > HORRIBLE AND...²   
   > >   
   > > Lindelof touted the MTV admission on Twitter, first saying, ³I copped to   
   > > the fact that we should have done a better job of not being gratuitous in   
   > > our representation of a barely clothed actress,² and then joking, ³We   
   > > also had Kirk shirtless in underpants in both movies. Do not want to make   
   > > light of something that some construe as mysogenistic.²   
   > >   
   > > He followed that post with an apology for misspelling misogynist and by   
   > > writing, ³What I'm saying is I hear you, I take responsibility and will   
   > > be more mindful in the future.²   
   >   
   > Afaik, there's appreciable difference between misogyny and gratuitous   
   > sex.   
      
      
   Doesn't have to be though.   
      
   --   
   "Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca