Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.startrek.misc    |    General discussions of Star Trek    |    11,234 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 10,377 of 11,234    |
|    Jim G. to All    |
|    Re: Alice Eve lingerie in 'Star Trek' mi    |
|    24 May 13 12:14:07    |
      XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.movies.current-films       From: jimgysin@geemail.com.invalid              Ubiquitous sent the following on 5/23/2013 6:21 AM:       > By John Horn       >       > It’s one of the strangest scenes in “Star Trek Into Darkness”: With no       > explanation or motivation, USS Enterprise visitor Carol (Alice Eve)       > strips down to her blue underwear, whereupon James T. Kirk (Chris Pine)       > sneaks a peek.       >       > Now, Damon Lindelof, who co-wrote the film’s screenplay, is apologizing       > for the gratuitous sequence — sort of.       >       > In an email interview with MTV, Lindelof was asked why the “Men in Black       > III” actress was obligated to show off her ripped body.       >       > “Why is Alice Eve in her underwear, gratuitously and unnecessarily,       > without any real effort made as to why in God's name she would undress in       > that circumstance? Well, there's a very good answer for that. But I'm not       > telling you what it is. Because... uh... MYSTERY?,” Lindelof wrote.       >       > He said there was a scene written for Khan (Benedict Cumberbatch) to       > remove his shirt, but “I don’t think it ever got shot. You know why?       > Because getting actors to take their clothes off is DEMEANING AND       > HORRIBLE AND...”       >       > Lindelof touted the MTV admission on Twitter, first saying, “I copped to       > the fact that we should have done a better job of not being gratuitous in       > our representation of a barely clothed actress,” and then joking, “We       > also had Kirk shirtless in underpants in both movies. Do not want to make       > light of something that some construe as mysogenistic.”       >       > He followed that post with an apology for misspelling misogynist and by       > writing, “What I'm saying is I hear you, I take responsibility and will       > be more mindful in the future.”              Damn, there's no shortage of oversensitive twits in the world, is there?              And in addition to not knowing (initially) how to *spell*       "misogynistic," Lindelof is also pretty much clueless of what it means.              --       Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre       "I was wondering if you could give me some advice on how to handle       stress." -- Norma Bates, BATES MOTEL              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca