XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.movies.current-films   
   From: anim8rfsk@cox.net   
      
   In article ,   
    Mason Barge  wrote:   
      
   > On Fri, 24 May 2013 07:24:20 -0700, anim8rFSK    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   > >In article <9ihsp8tqpq1cmn6646lt33lbmgoma6o5l7@4ax.com>,   
   > > Mason Barge  wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> On Thu, 23 May 2013 08:04:55 -0700 (PDT), moviePig   
   > >>  wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >> >On May 23, 7:21 am, Ubiquitous  wrote:   
   > >> >> By John Horn   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> It’s one of the strangest scenes in “Star Trek Into Darkness”: With no   
   > >> >> explanation or motivation, USS Enterprise visitor Carol (Alice Eve)   
   > >> >> strips down to her blue underwear, whereupon James T. Kirk (Chris Pine)   
   > >> >> sneaks a peek.   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> Now, Damon Lindelof, who co-wrote the film’s screenplay, is apologizing   
   > >> >> for the gratuitous sequence — sort of.   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> In an email interview with MTV, Lindelof was asked why the “Men in   
   > >> >> Black   
   > >> >> III” actress was obligated to show off her ripped body.   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> “Why is Alice Eve in her underwear, gratuitously and unnecessarily,   
   > >> >> without any real effort made as to why in God's name she would undress   
   > >> >> in   
   > >> >> that circumstance? Well, there's a very good answer for that. But I'm   
   > >> >> not   
   > >> >> telling you what it is. Because... uh... MYSTERY?,” Lindelof wrote.   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> He said there was a scene written for Khan (Benedict Cumberbatch) to   
   > >> >> remove his shirt, but “I don’t think it ever got shot. You know why?   
   > >> >> Because getting actors to take their clothes off is DEMEANING AND   
   > >> >> HORRIBLE AND...”   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> Lindelof touted the MTV admission on Twitter, first saying, “I copped   
   > >> >> to   
   > >> >> the fact that we should have done a better job of not being gratuitous   
   > >> >> in   
   > >> >> our representation of a barely clothed actress,” and then joking, “We   
   > >> >> also had Kirk shirtless in underpants in both movies. Do not want to   
   > >> >> make   
   > >> >> light of something that some construe as mysogenistic.”   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> He followed that post with an apology for misspelling misogynist and by   
   > >> >> writing, “What I'm saying is I hear you, I take responsibility and will   
   > >> >> be more mindful in the future.”   
   > >> >   
   > >> >Afaik, there's appreciable difference between misogyny and gratuitous   
   > >> >sex.   
   > >>   
   > >> No kidding.  It may be a very soft-core pr0n but who the hell calls   
   > >> men wanting to look at women's bodies "misogynistic"?   
   > >   
   > >Wimmin.   
   >   
   > I can remember a house at Smith that only allowed "wimmin" to enter.   
   > The occupants could not even own a male dog or cat.   
      
   Well, there you go then.   
      
   --   
   "Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)