Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.startrek.misc    |    General discussions of Star Trek    |    11,202 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 10,397 of 11,202    |
|    Jim G. to All    |
|    Re: Alice Eve lingerie in 'Star Trek' mi    |
|    29 May 13 14:26:50    |
      XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.movies.current-films       From: jimgysin@geemail.com.invalid              WrongWayWade sent the following on 5/28/2013 2:06 PM:       > Jim G. wrote:       >> Ubiquitous sent the following on 5/23/2013 6:21 AM:       >>> By John Horn       >>>       >>> It’s one of the strangest scenes in “Star Trek Into Darkness”: With       >>> no explanation or motivation, USS Enterprise visitor Carol (Alice       >>> Eve) strips down to her blue underwear, whereupon James T. Kirk       >>> (Chris Pine) sneaks a peek.       >>>       >>> Now, Damon Lindelof, who co-wrote the film’s screenplay, is       >>> apologizing for the gratuitous sequence — sort of.       >>>       >>> In an email interview with MTV, Lindelof was asked why the “Men in       >>> Black III” actress was obligated to show off her ripped body.       >>>       >>> “Why is Alice Eve in her underwear, gratuitously and unnecessarily,       >>> without any real effort made as to why in God's name she would       >>> undress in that circumstance? Well, there's a very good answer for       >>> that. But I'm not telling you what it is. Because... uh...       >>> MYSTERY?,” Lindelof wrote. He said there was a scene written for Khan       >>> (Benedict Cumberbatch) to       >>> remove his shirt, but “I don’t think it ever got shot. You know why?       >>> Because getting actors to take their clothes off is DEMEANING AND       >>> HORRIBLE AND...”       >>>       >>> Lindelof touted the MTV admission on Twitter, first saying, “I       >>> copped to the fact that we should have done a better job of not       >>> being gratuitous in our representation of a barely clothed actress,”       >>> and then joking, “We also had Kirk shirtless in underpants in both       >>> movies. Do not want to make light of something that some construe as       >>> mysogenistic.” He followed that post with an apology for misspelling       >>> misogynist and       >>> by writing, “What I'm saying is I hear you, I take responsibility       >>> and will be more mindful in the future.”       >>       >> Damn, there's no shortage of oversensitive twits in the world, is       >> there?       >> And in addition to not knowing (initially) how to *spell*       >> "misogynistic," Lindelof is also pretty much clueless of what it       >> means.       >       > Exactly. We want to see Alice Eve scantily clad because we LIKE her, so       > misogyny is exactly the wrong word.              That's such a hateful thing for you to say, you hater.              > Misogyny: hatred, dislike, or mistrust of women.       >       > Maybe we want to see her scantily clad because we don't trust her?? (hidden       > weapons)?              I'd mention that searching her would be fun, but then I'd be hating again.              --       Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre       "I was wondering if you could give me some advice on how to handle       stress." -- Norma Bates, BATES MOTEL              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca