XPost: alt.tv.star-trek.next-gen, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv   
   From: thetruemelissa@gmail.com   
      
   Verily, in article <105rspc$g17u$1@dont-email.me>, did   
   YourName@YourISP.com deliver unto us this message:   
      
   >   
   > The problem is it *was* meant to be part of the Star Trek franchise   
   > (depsite not including "Star Trek" in the show's title) and it simply   
   > did not even remotely fit.   
      
   I agree. I did like things about it, though.   
      
   > If they had called the show and characters by new names and not had it   
   > as part of the Star Trek franchise, then it may or may not have been   
   > any good as a sci-fi TV show - that wouldbe personal opinion and the   
   > idiotic "oil me 'up Scotty" scenes would still have stopped me   
   > bothering to watch it.   
      
   LOL, I'd forgotten about the decontamination protocol. That was pretty   
   blatant.   
      
   > "The Orville" was better "Star Trek" than any of the newer stuff, and   
   > that is not part of Star Trek franchise.   
      
   I thought it was okay, but I didn't like it as much as some did. It   
   often made less sense than Star Trek, which is its own kind of   
   accomplishment. A lot of the acting was good, though.   
      
      
      
   --   
   Saturday Doctor Who watch party 1:00 p.m. Pacific time   
      
   This week: Spearhead From Space   [Third Doctor]   
   https://discord.gg/Fd6Znkme?event=1396482295044640778   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)