Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.startrek.misc    |    General discussions of Star Trek    |    11,202 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 10,901 of 11,202    |
|    Ubiquitous to thetruemelissa@gmail.com    |
|    Re: AI/LLM reviews of STNG - Darmok    |
|    09 Sep 25 04:31:04    |
      XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.startrek.current, rec.arts.startrek.fandom       XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv, can.arts.sf       From: weberm@polaris.net              thetruemelissa@gmail.com wrote:       > anim8rfsk@cox.net wrote:              >> You couldn?t possibly develop a language like that naturally. You'd have       >> to start with a real language and then change it just to be annoying.       >       >I'm not so sure about "couldn't possibly." They would need to learn the       >stories somehow, but (according to the fan wiki) the official position       >is that they *mostly* speak in metaphor. Children presumably learn some       >basics in plainer language, which really should have been tried with       >Picard, but a highly metaphorical species might not have thought of it.              It's been discussed before (and better), but you cannot have a language       that is _entirely_ memes.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca