Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.startrek.misc    |    General discussions of Star Trek    |    11,234 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11,230 of 11,234    |
|    Your Name to All    |
|    Re: What The Hell is This Mess?    |
|    02 Mar 26 11:01:46    |
      XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.startrek.current, rec.arts.tv       From: YourName@YourISP.com              On 2026-03-01 21:54:51 +0000, Lawrence D´Oliveiro said:       > On Sun, 1 Mar 2026 10:42:33 -0500, The True Melissa wrote:       >>       >> I've read that the screen contents have to be pasted in later, since       >> glare would prevent them from being filmed.       >       > Compositing was required, not so much because of glare I don’t think,       > but because of a mismatch of frame rates that would lead to unpleasant       > and distracting flicker.       >       > I look at modern TV news studios, with back walls covered with huge LCD       > panels showing remote interviewees and correspondents, location       > footage, weather pictures etc, and they’re all captured by the studio       > cameras just fine (with all frame rates locked together, of course),       > with no discernible glare at all.              Another problem can also be unwanted reflections of the camera and crew       being seen in glass in the scene (computer screens, TVs, motorbike or       space helmet visors, car or shop windows, etc.) These would have to be       edited out or replaced in post production, which can be difficult even       with modern computer editing.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca