XPost: alt.startrek, alt.tv.star-trek, alt.tv.star-trek.enterprise
XPost: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: fluidstates_NO+SPAM@REMOVE-ME.verizon.IHATESPAM.SPAM_VAC.com
"ToolPackinMama" wrote in message
news:11c162k7irhc2ad@news.supernews.com...
> David Johnston wrote:
>> On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 17:16:20 -0500, Brian Thorn
>> wrote:
>
>>>And she goes back to a point seven years after Voyager was marooned in
>>>the Delta instead of going back farther and preventing the whole
>>>three-hour tour in the first place.
>>
>>
>> She wanted to keep Seven of Nine.
>
> Doesn't ~everybody~!? :)
I would have happily traded her in for a real actress, with some real
character development, any day. I got sick of watching them - the
producers/directors - watching her - that is, doing a catsuit shot while she
was doing something about something as interesting as a bar of soap.
I, yesterday, stumbled on a fan site of the television show that pretty much
created the TV catsuit - The Avengers Forever site. Now, if you want to put
a woman into a catsuit, you've got to make her interesting so that men just
go ga-ga over anything and everything she does.
Like Diana Rigg's Emma Peel. Now THAT"S a woman!
Seven? Falsies and an empty character do not a sex machine make. She was
as interesting as watching a body decompose - I just couldn't stand it after
about 10 episodes after she first appeared. It was just /so/ obvious why
she was there - and it certainly wasn't the drive the plots forward. After
her first season I was like "Just get the bitch off the screen, please. If
she's doing Janeway behind everyone's back at LEAST they can show it and
make something /truly/ interesting!"
But, honestly, I /thought/ she was bad...until we met T'Pol. Let's talk
about empty characters, why don't we?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
