XPost: alt.fan.starwars, alt.startrek, rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc   
   XPost: rec.arts.startrek.current   
   From: anybody@anywhere-anytime.com   
      
   In article <1133661333.144000.218110@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,   
   spiritofsupergirl@hotmail.com wrote:   
      
   > Sean Walsh: Piettus Worshipus wrote:   
   > > M.H. wrote:   
   > > > spiritofsupergirl@hotmail.com wrote:   
   > > > >   
   > > > > I've been watching Star Trek for over a decade, but I'm rather new to   
   > > > > Star Wars. I've read that the Star Trek canon consists of only the   
   > > > > live-action stuff (with perhaps some exceptions), and the Star Wars   
   > > > > canon consists of the 6 films, the novels, and perhaps some other   
   > > > > stuff. So I'm wondering which canon is bigger when you add up all of   
   > > > > the canonical materials for each.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Mark Moore   
   > > >   
   > > > SW canon does not include any of the books or expanded universe, only   
   > > > the 6 movies   
   > > > I don't even think the christmas special counts even though it was on   
   > > > film with the original actors playing the original characters   
   > >   
   > > I think Lucas has gone on record as denouncing its very existance.   
   > >   
   > > That's the 1 thing I think he's said that ALL Star Wars fans completely   
   > > agree with.   
   >   
   > Christmas special? Okay, since I'm a SW newbie, someone please explain   
   > this.   
      
   You don't want to know. It was an awful, drug-induced pile of doggy-doo   
   made after the original "Star Wars" movie was released that even George   
   Lucas disowned. Believe me, everyeon who sees it wishes they hadn't, so   
   save yourself the pain.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)