XPost: alt.fan.starwars, alt.startrek, rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc   
   XPost: rec.arts.startrek.current   
   From: tf_martn@bellsouth.net   
      
   "Sean Walsh: Piettus Worshipus" wrote in message   
   news:1133659019.911063.89310@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...   
   > M.H. wrote:   
   > > spiritofsupergirl@hotmail.com wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > > I've been watching Star Trek for over a decade, but I'm rather new to   
   > > > Star Wars. I've read that the Star Trek canon consists of only the   
   > > > live-action stuff (with perhaps some exceptions), and the Star Wars   
   > > > canon consists of the 6 films, the novels, and perhaps some other   
   > > > stuff. So I'm wondering which canon is bigger when you add up all of   
   > > > the canonical materials for each.   
   > > >   
   > > > Mark Moore   
   > >   
   > > SW canon does not include any of the books or expanded universe, only   
   > > the 6 movies   
   > > I don't even think the christmas special counts even though it was on   
   > > film with the original actors playing the original characters   
   >   
   > I think Lucas has gone on record as denouncing its very existance.   
   >   
   > That's the 1 thing I think he's said that ALL Star Wars fans completely   
   > agree with.   
   >   
   > --   
      
   Yeah cause wasn't like Bea Arthur in it and people sang?   
   I think the two live action Ewok movies are canon for whatever that is   
   worth, as is the two animated Clone Wars series.   
      
   Tim   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|