XPost: alt.startrek, rec.arts.startrek.current, rec.arts.tv   
   From: peattyg47-1230@copper.net   
      
   On 11 May 2006 05:29:27 -0700, "videonovels@yahoo.com"   
    wrote:   
      
   >Gene declared ST5 to be "apocryphal".   
   >Therefore it is not considered canon.   
   >Therefore spiritofsupergirl was correct was she said "No it is not   
   >[canon]."   
   >   
   >Clear?   
      
   The argument is, but I ain't buyin.  Roddenberry was on record saying, "It's   
   not Star Trek until I say it's Star Trek."  But even he has to give way to   
   what's on the screen.  My own view is that if it was ever aired, it's canon,   
   and there is no revisionism.  Now we can all decide which parts of that   
   canon we will accept, but that's a different subject ..   
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
   __   
      
   This space left blank   
      
   *** Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com ***   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)