XPost: alt.startrek, rec.arts.startrek.current, rec.arts.tv   
   From: kweeg@nospam.shaw.ca   
      
   "George Peatty"  wrote in message   
   news:dip662pdq7mngo0vl3q8i5t6bsm2ic44c9@4ax.com...   
   > On 11 May 2006 05:29:27 -0700, "videonovels@yahoo.com"   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   > >Gene declared ST5 to be "apocryphal".   
   > >Therefore it is not considered canon.   
   > >Therefore spiritofsupergirl was correct was she said "No it is not   
   > >[canon]."   
   > >   
   > >Clear?   
   >   
   > The argument is, but I ain't buyin.  Roddenberry was on record saying,   
   "It's   
   > not Star Trek until I say it's Star Trek."  But even he has to give way to   
   > what's on the screen.  My own view is that if it was ever aired, it's   
   canon,   
   > and there is no revisionism.  Now we can all decide which parts of that   
   > canon we will accept, but that's a different subject ..   
      
   Indeed.   
      
   --   
      
   Qapla'   
   Kweeg   
   Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal   
   "Half a gallon a'scotch!" Scotty (Spectre of the Gun)   
   1,079,252,848.8 km/h, not just a good idea, it's the law.   
   "So say we all!"   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)