XPost: alt.startrek, alt.tv.star-trek, alt.tv.star-trek.enterprise   
   XPost: rec.arts.startrek.current   
   From: anybody@anywhere-anytime.com   
      
   In article , David Johnston   
    wrote:   
      
   > On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:17:45 +1300, Anybody   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   > >In article <5108grF1hl8f2U1@mid.individual.net>, "EvilBill"   
   > > wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> David Johnston wrote:   
   > >> > On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 17:43:49 -0000, "EvilBill"    
   > >> > wrote:   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> And somehow I don't think multibillionaire execs are going to starve   
   > >> >   
   > >> > Of course they won't starve.  They'll fire people.  Or they'll use   
   > >> > their golden parachutes while the company goes bust.   
   > >>   
   > >> I also doubt Paramount will go bust without Star Trek. They do make   
   > >> other movies and TV shows too, after all.   
   > >   
   > >They might even be forced into doing something creative, like making up   
   > >their own show ideas.  :-)   
   >   
   > When did "Star Trek fan" become synonymous with "Someone who wants to   
   > never see Star Trek on TV again"?   
      
   About the same time the idiots were put in charge and started trying to   
   change Star Trek into something that is "Star Trek" in name only (or in   
   the case of "Enterprise", not even in name).   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)