XPost: alt.startrek, alt.tv.star-trek, alt.tv.star-trek.enterprise
XPost: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: jax@knickersjaxtrawstudios.com
80 Knight wrote:
> "Anybody" wrote in message
> news:150120071919313333%anybody@anywhere-anytime.com...
>> In article , David
>> Johnston wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:21:53 +1300, Anybody
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> When did "Star Trek fan" become synonymous with "Someone who
>>>>> wants to never see Star Trek on TV again"?
>>>>
>>>> About the same time the idiots were put in charge and started
>>>> trying to change Star Trek into something that is "Star Trek" in
>>>> name only (or in the case of "Enterprise", not even in name).
>>>
>>> Oh bullshit. Those self-same idiots were in charge starting with
>>> TNG.
>>
>> No they weren't. Beavis & Butthead took over full control later,
>
> Wrong. Gene Rodenberry died in 1991, TNG didn't end until 1993. B&B
> ran the show from then on.
>
>> and neither had a clue how to do "Star Trek", nor did they even want
>> to.
>
> Yes. Exactly. That is why TNG was one of the highest rated
> shows.....
>
>> Both simply wanted to add a big name to their own portfolios - yet
>> another form of selfish greed.
>
> Wow. To think people in this world have the never to want to make
> money.
> I am the first one to admit that Berman and Bragga ruined
> "Enterprise". However, they also wrote some damned good episodes of
> TNG and Voyager.
Yet strangely, demanding that millions of dollars be spent producing TV
shows and movies to satisfy a few fans isn't selfish and greedy at all,
apparently.
Ian
--
www.jaxtrawstudios.com
science fiction comics with shagging in
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
