XPost: alt.startrek, alt.tv.star-trek, alt.tv.star-trek.enterprise   
   XPost: rec.arts.startrek.current   
   From: RightBack@cha.com   
      
   On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 07:23:25 +0000, Kweeg wrote:   
      
   >   
   > Hey that's great! I know that's one thing Trek promotes is to keep one's   
   > mind on the straight and especially narrow.   
      
   Oooohhhh! Sarcasm! How constructive!   
      
   > I believe that there is hope for new Trek.   
      
   What's being proposed is not "new Trek". It's a   
   reboot/reimagining/re-whatever of old Trek.   
      
   > It is a fact season 4 of   
   > Enterprise was headed out of the vacuous abyss that Voyager, the last 2   
   > TNG movies and Enterprise's first 3 seasons drove it into.   
      
   True. I also thought season 3 of Enterprise was good. I thought Nemsis   
   wasn't as bad as Insurrection though. Voyager was crap.   
      
   >To be fair to   
   > Ent though TNG's first 2 seasons were pretty damn painful.   
      
   Especially when viewed today. Back in the day, though, I didn't really   
   mind, although I was much younger and had less sophisticated taste back   
   then.   
      
   >   
   > But you and "Anybody" are probably right, we should keep our minds   
   > closed to new ideas (and any new Trek)   
      
   Let's say, for sake of argument, that that's what I'm doing. What wrong   
   with that? Doesn't my way of thinking add diversity? IDIC.   
      
   >and especially jump to   
   > conclusions on little or no information.   
      
   I have all the information I need.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)