[continued from previous message]   
      
   need regenerative systems. We can't carry enough consumables for a multi-year   
      
      
    00:40:06   
    mission. So, we're developing these systems, testing them on   
   the ISS, but they add complexity. They add mass. They add cost. And that's   
   another reason why going back to the moon is harder because we're not just   
   trying to replicate Apollo. We're trying to build systems that will work   
   for longer, more ambitious missions. Now, let me address something that   
   conspiracy theorists love to bring up. The photographic evidence. They   
   say the photos are too perfect, too well composed, too professional. And   
   you   
      
    00:40:38   
    know what? They're right about one thing. The photos are   
   remarkably good. Almost every shot is wellframed and properly exposed. But   
   here's the explanation. The cameras were specially modified Hasselblad 500   
   eel cameras. They had a RAO plate, a glass plate with crosshairs etched on   
   it that imprinted a grid on every image. This grid serves two purposes. One,   
   it proves the photos are unaltered. Any editing would distort the grid. Two,   
   it allows scientists to measure distances and sizes in the   
      
    00:41:12   
      
    photos. The cameras had fixed focus set to the hyper focal distance. So   
   everything from about 10 ft to infinity was in focus. The astronauts didn't   
   have to focus. They just had to point and shoot. The exposure was preset   
   based on the lighting conditions on the moon. the sun, the lunar surface   
   reflectance, it's all very predictable. So, they could set the exposure in   
   advance and it would work for almost every shot. And the composition, the   
   astronauts practiced. They took thousands of practice photos   
      
    00:41:45   
   on Earth. They trained until framing a shot became second nature. So, the   
   quality of the photos isn't evidence of a hoax. It's evidence of careful   
   preparation and good engineering. But here's what's interesting. We have   
   the original film, The Negatives, and they show evidence of being exposed   
   in space. Tiny tracks from cosmic ray hits. These are high energy particles   
   that pass through the film and leave traces. You can see them if you look   
   carefully. These cosmic ray tracks are impossible   
      
    00:42:17   
    to fake. You   
   can't create them in a lab, at least not convincingly. They're proof that the   
   film was exposed to the radiation environment of space. So, the photos are   
   real. They were taken on the moon and the quality is due to good preparation,   
   not fakery. Now, let me talk about something that's often overlooked. The   
   logistics, the sheer scale of the Apollo program. At its peak, 400,000 people   
   were working on Apollo. Contractors, engineers, technicians, administrators   
   across the entire United States. If the moon   
      
    00:42:55   
    landings were   
   faked, all those people would have to be in on the conspiracy. Or at least   
   a large number of them would have to know. And in 50 years, not one person   
   has come forward with credible evidence of a hoax. Think about that. Humans   
   are terrible at keeping secrets, especially big secrets involving lots   
   of people. Someone always talks. Someone always leaks. And yet, despite   
   thousands of people working on Apollo, despite 50 years of investigation   
   by skeptics and conspiracy theorists, no one has   
      
    00:43:33   
    produced any   
   credible evidence of a hoax. The simplest explanation, it wasn't a hoax. It   
   really happened. But let me address another common claim, the flag waving. I   
   mentioned this earlier, but let me go deeper. In the vacuum of the moon,   
   objects behave differently than on Earth. There's no air resistance. So,   
   when you set something in motion, it keeps moving. It oscillates longer. It   
   takes longer to settle. The flag had a horizontal rod at the top to keep it   
   extended. When the astronauts planted   
      
    00:44:11   
    the flag pole, they had to   
   twist it and push it into the lunar soil. That twisting created motion in the   
   flag and because there's no air resistance, the flag kept waving for several   
   seconds. In some of the video footage, you can see the flag moving. But if   
   you watch carefully, you'll notice it only moves when the astronauts are   
   handling the pole. When they step away, the flag continues to move briefly,   
   then stops. Exactly as you'd expect in a vacuum. On Earth, in air, the   
   flag would stop   
      
    00:44:46   
    moving almost immediately. The air resistance   
   would damp the oscillations. But on the moon, the flag keeps moving. That's   
   actually evidence that they were in a vacuum. Evidence that they were really   
   on the moon. Now, let me talk about the shadows. Another common conspiracy   
   claim is that the shadows in the lunar photos go in different directions,   
   which they say proves multiple light sources, which they say proves studio   
   lighting. But the explanation is simple geometry. The moon's surface isn't   
   flat. It's uneven.   
      
    00:45:23   
    There are hills, craters, slopes. When light   
   hits an uneven surface, shadows can appear to go in different directions,   
   even though there's only one light source, the Sunday. You can test this   
   yourself. Go outside on a sunny day. Look at the shadows on uneven ground. They   
   don't all point in exactly the same direction. That's normal. That's how light   
   and shadows work. So, the varying shadows aren't evidence of multiple light   
   sources. They're evidence of an uneven surface, which is exactly   
      
    00:45:55   
      
    what the moon has. Now, let me talk about something really important,   
   the tracking data. During the Apollo missions, radio telescopes around   
   the world tracked the spacecraft. Amateur radio enthusiasts picked up the   
   signals. The Soviet Union monitored everything. These independent observers   
   all confirmed that the signals were coming from the moon. They could tell   
   by the time delay radio signals travel at the speed of light. So there's   
   a 1.3 second delay from the moon. They could tell by the Doppler shift in   
   the signals as the   
      
    00:46:27   
    spacecraft moved. You can't fake that. You   
   can't create signals that appear to come from the moon when they're actually   
   coming from Earth. The physics doesn't allow it. So we have independent   
   verification from multiple sources that the Apollo spacecraft went to the   
   moon. Not just NASA saying it, independent observers confirming it. That's   
   pretty strong evidence. Now, let me talk about the retroreflectors. During   
   the Apollo missions, astronauts place laser retroreflectors on the lunar   
      
   00:46:57   
    surface. These are special mirrors that reflect light back exactly   
   in the direction it came from. And you know what? You can bounce a laser   
   off these retroreflectors right now. Observatories around the world do it   
   regularly. They measure the distance to the moon with incredible precision by   
   timing how long it takes light to travel to the retroreflector and back. How   
   did those retroreflectors get there? Someone had to place them. And the only   
   missions that went to those locations were the Apollo missions. So, we have   
   physical   
      
    00:47:29   
    evidence still on the moon, still functional after   
   50 years, proving that astronauts were there. Now, conspiracy theorists say   
   that unmanned probes could have placed the retroreflectors. And technically,   
   that's true. The Soviet Union did place retroreflectors on the moon using   
   unmanned missions. But if Apollo was faked, why would NASA bother sending   
   unmanned missions to place retroreflectors? That would be almost as hard   
   as sending astronauts. What's the point? The simplest explanation is that   
   astronauts   
      
    00:48:05   
    placed them because astronauts went to the moon. Now,   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)