Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.comp.os.windows-11    |    Steaming pile of horseshit Windows 11    |    4,852 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,002 of 4,852    |
|    Paul to Physics Perspective    |
|    Re: Why It's "IMPOSSIBLE" Humans Landed     |
|    10 Dec 25 00:57:58    |
      [continued from previous message]              people want to go to planets. We're evolved for planetary life. We want ground       beneath our feet, a horizon, a sky, even if it's a Martian sky. So, I think       we'll pursue both space stations and planetary colonies. Different approaches       to the same goal, expanding human civilization beyond Earth. Now, let me talk       about timelines.               01:13:56        When will we actually go to Mars? NASA says the       2030s. Maybe if the funding holds, if the technology works, if the political       will persists, SpaceX is more ambitious. Elon Musk talks about the 2020s,       building a city on Mars, sending hundreds of people. But that seems optimistic,       wildly optimistic. My guess, first humans on Mars in the 2032s, a small crew,       a short stay, a flags and footprints mission like Apollo, and then decades       more before we establish a permanent presence. It's going to be               01:14:39       slow, much slower than people hope because Mars is really hard and because       we don't have the same urgency we had with the moon race. Unless something       changes, unless China or another country makes it a national priority, unless       there's a new space race, then things could accelerate. Competition drives       progress. That's what got us to the moon. Kennedy framed it as a race against       the Soviets. And that motivated the spending, the effort, the focus. Maybe we       need that again. a new competitor, a new challenge, something               01:15:18        to       drive us forward. Now, let me talk about something philosophical. The meaning       of space exploration. Why does it matter? Why should we care? Some people       say we shouldn't. They say we should fix problems on Earth first. Poverty,       disease, climate change. Spend money on those, not on space. And I understand       that argument. I really do. There are serious problems on Earth that need       attention. But here's the thing. Space exploration doesn't take away from       solving Earth's problems. The entire               01:15:53        global space industry is       about $400 billion per year. That sounds like a lot, but it's less than       half a percent of global GDP. It's a tiny fraction of what we spend on       everything else. And space technology helps solve Earth problems. Weather       satellites help predict storms and save lives. GPS enables navigation and       commerce. Earth observation satellites monitor climate change, deforestation,       ocean health. Communication satellites connect remote areas. The technology       we develop for space, solar panels, water               01:16:29        purification, medical       devices finds applications on Earth. Space exploration drives innovation that       benefits everyone. But more than that, space exploration is about hope. It's       about believing in the future. It's about dreaming big. It's about showing what       humans can accomplish when we work together toward a common goal. The Apollo       program inspired an entire generation. Kids who watched the moon landings       became scientists, engineers, entrepreneurs. They created the technologies       we use today. Computers,               01:17:09        the internet, smartphones, all of it       traces back in part to the inspiration and innovation of the space age. So       space exploration isn't a luxury. It's an investment in our future. It's how we       inspire the next generation to solve the challenges we face. Now, let me talk       about something that really excites me. The Cardartesev scale. I've mentioned       this before, but let me go deeper. This is a way of classifying civilizations       based on energy use. Type one is planetary. We control all the energy of                      01:17:46        our planet. We can manipulate weather, prevent earthquakes,       harness geothermal energy, solar energy, everything. We're currently about       type0.7. We're getting there, but we're not there yet. Type two is stellar. We       can harness all the energy of our star. A Dyson sphere, a mega structure that       surrounds the sun and captures all its output. Sounds like science fiction,       but it's physically possible. Type three is galactic. We can harness the       energy of an entire galaxy. We're talking about a               01:18:23        civilization       that spans millions of star systems, that can manipulate black holes, that       operates on a cosmic scale. Now, where are we? We're type 0.7. We still get       most of our energy from fossil fuels, dead plants. That's primitive. That's       caveman stuff on a cosmic scale. But we're transitioning. Solar power,       wind power, nuclear power, clean energy. In a hundred years, maybe 200,       we'll hit type one. We'll be a planetary civilization. And then the next step       is type two. To reach that, we need to               01:18:59        expand into space. We       need to colonize other worlds. We need to build solar power satellites,       space habitats, maybe eventually a Dyson sphere that's thousands of years       away, maybe tens of thousands, but it's the direction we're headed if we       don't destroy ourselves first. And that's the key question. Will we make       it? Will we survive long enough to become a type one, type two, type three       civilization? Or will we destroy ourselves through war, environmental collapse,       or some other catastrophe? I'm               01:19:31        optimistic. I think we'll make       it, but it's not guaranteed. We have to work for it. We have to make the       right choices. And space exploration is part of that. It's how we ensure       long-term survival. is how we spread humanity across multiple worlds so       that no single disaster can wipe us out. Now, let me talk about something       personal. My own journey with physics in space. When I was 8 years old       and I saw that photo of Einstein's unfinished manuscript, I knew I wanted       to understand the universe. I               01:20:02        wanted to know how everything       works. And as I learned more, as I studied physics, I realized that space       is part of that. Understanding the universe means understanding not just the       laws of physics but also our place in the cosmos. The moon landings showed us       something profound. They showed us earth from space. That famous earthrise       photo from Apollo 8, the blue marble photo from Apollo 17. These images       changed how we see ourselves. We realize that Earth is small, fragile,       a tiny island of life in a vast hostile universe. And that               01:20:40       realization led to the environmental movement to the understanding that we       need to take care of our planet because it's the only one we have. But it       also showed us that we don't have to stay on this one planet forever. We       can reach other worlds. We can expand our horizons. We're not limited to       Earth. And that's a powerful idea. It means the future is open. It means we       have choices. It means humanity has a destiny beyond this one planet. Now,       let me address something important. The               01:21:10        conspiracy theories. Why       do people believe the moon landings were faked? Part of it is distrust of       government. People saw the government lie about Vietnam, Watergate, all       kinds of things. So, they think if they lied about that, maybe they lied       about the moon, too. Part of it is the seeming impossibility of it. As we've       discussed, the moon landings really were incredible, almost too incredible to       believe. So some people just can't accept that we actually did it. And part       of it is the desire to be part of a special group               01:21:43        that knows the       real truth. Conspiracy theories make people feel smart, like they figured out       something others haven't. But the evidence is overwhelming. We really went to       the moon. The physics works out. The engineering makes sense. The independent       verification confirms it. The physical evidence exists. Believing it was              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca