XPost: comp.os.linux.misc   
   From: tnp@invalid.invalid   
      
   On 09/12/2025 20:20, rbowman wrote:   
      
   > The rolling diameter is no more or less inaccurate than the rolling   
   > circumference. Are you familiar with the process of calibrating a bicycle   
   > speedometer? You mark the tire and ride a specific number of revolutions,   
   > measuring the distance covered. That gives you the rolling circumference   
   > which is not necessarily the same circumference of the unladen tire.   
   >   
   Bollocks. There is no 'rolling diameter.'   
      
   Otherwise a flat tyre would tear itself off the rim   
      
   > But have it your way, as you will.   
   >   
   Its not my way, it's the facts.   
      
      
   --   
   "In our post-modern world, climate science is not powerful because it is   
   true: it is true because it is powerful."   
      
   Lucas Bergkamp   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)