Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.comp.os.windows-11    |    Steaming pile of horseshit Windows 11    |    4,852 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,008 of 4,852    |
|    The Natural Philosopher to All    |
|    Re: Double booting    |
|    10 Dec 25 10:45:56    |
      XPost: comp.os.linux.misc       From: tnp@invalid.invalid              On 10/12/2025 01:50, c186282 wrote:       > On 12/9/25 06:53, Daniel70 wrote:       >> On 9/12/2025 9:09 pm, The Natural Philosopher wrote:       >>> On 09/12/2025 08:35, c186282 wrote:       >>>> On 12/8/25 17:41, rbowman wrote:       >>>>> On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 14:59:12 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote:       >>>>>       >>>>>> No, this is intentional calibration of the car speedometer to 5       >>>>>> kilometres low. The reason is that if you see a road limit of 100Km/h       >>>>>> and you do drive at 100Km/h sharp, there is no possibility of you       >>>>>> driving just a bit above the limit and be fined. You could then       >>>>>> sue the       >>>>>> car maker for having bad instrumentation that caused you to be fined.       >>>>>       >>>>> That's the reason I've heard for Japanese bike speedometers being       >>>>> off. The       >>>>> speedometer in the Toyota is accurate when I'm running the 15"       >>>>> tires it's       >>>>> calibrated for.       >>>>       >>>> Yep, tire diameter IS critical.       >>>>       >>> There is no 'tire diameter'       >>>       >>> Only circumference.       >>       >> .... and, as circumference is dependant on diameter/radius ......       >       > Exactly.       >       > Pi*D = circumference       >       > Elastic properties of tires can make a       > small headache, but overall ...       >       Nope. Circumference is not dependent on diameter       Diameter is dependent on circumference. but only if the object is       perfectly round.              Imagine a car with bricks for wheels. It would run. But the brick has a       circumference. But no calculable diameter.              Ant convex object has a circumference about a given axis. Hell even my       waist. Only truly       spherical or cylindrical objects have a diameter however....                            --       There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale       returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact.              Mark Twain              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca