Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.comp.os.windows-11    |    Steaming pile of horseshit Windows 11    |    4,969 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,489 of 4,969    |
|    Paul to Carlos E.R.    |
|    Re: Underground fires    |
|    20 Dec 25 12:14:59    |
      XPost: comp.os.linux.misc       From: nospam@needed.invalid              On Sat, 12/20/2025 7:15 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote:              >       > Garbage should be burnt (if burnt at all) in a high temperature oven with       filters for toxic fumes.              An entrepreneur tried this and eventually gave up.       The process was not clean enough to be used, without consequences.              Any of the chemists I graduated with, could have told this person it won't       work.              It might have been something like dioxin. There was never a "final report"       or "lessons learned", to put a stop to someone else trying it.               "When plastic burns, it releases a cocktail of harmful chemicals into the       air.        These include dioxins, furans, mercury, and polychlorinated biphenyls       (PCBs).        Dioxins, in particular, are known carcinogens and can cause reproductive       and        developmental problems, damage the immune system, and interfere with       hormones."              There is a difference between filtering a truly trace chemical, and buckets       of bad stuff coming out the bottom of the rig.              This is what happens when the consumption method is not at a high enough       temperature. Raising the temperature of the process, increases the       price per ton, of the processing. But humans will "try to burn that shit       with gasoline", and even with a pure oxygen supply for help (dangerous),       the temperature of the output reactants is too low. Only a few combustive       gas mixtures, give relatively high output temperatures, and usually involve       relatively tiny molecules. It's possible an acceptable combustion process       needs three times that temperature, a plasma of some kind maybe. You can't       get there with combustion, it's going to take something a lot more whizzy       (and energy consumptive).              The Sun would make a good garbage bucket. But you'd have to find an article       that analyzes the consequences (other than the cost per ton of launching       garbage).              A fusion reactor gets nice and warm. The ignition facility (NIF) in the States       used for fusion research, the target zone there gets nice and warm, but       this is hardly cheap kit to be burning garbage. In the fusion reactor,       you're ruin the containment walls, with discarded tomato sandwich splatter :-)               https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Ignition_Facility#/med       a/File:NIF_target_chamber_2.jpg              There are continuing comments in the local news, about "solving our garbage       problem by burning it". I was born in a city that did this, burned garbage       in a relatively low temperature incinerator. I've been to that incinerator       in a pickup truck. The tailgate fell off our truck, into the pit which buffers       the garbage fed into the incinerator. It's 200 feet down. There is a ladder on       the side of the pit, covered in slime, for you to climb down :-) Well, the       crane operator at the pit was a champ. He picked up our tailgate with the       bucket scoop jaws, pulled it up the two hundred feet, and deposited it       on the ground next to the offload area. It was "only a little bit bent".              That incinerator used to shower us in soot and fallen debris. Any washing       outside, would get covered in debris and need to be washed again. It all       depended on the wind direction, as to who got the "output".              They don't do that any more. But I bet the politicians reminisce about       how "successful" that operation was. Today, there is a lawn over top of       everything that went on there, and methane vent pipes on the premises.       That garbage today, is like most cities, driven out of town on 40 foot trailers       and such.              Today, a new town dump costs about $500,000,000 to build, and has a       liner in the bottom to collect toxic fluids. That figure, is what       stokes all this interest in combustion :-)               Paul              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca