Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.comp.os.windows-11    |    Steaming pile of horseshit Windows 11    |    4,969 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,834 of 4,969    |
|    Paul to Cheep Cheep...    |
|    Re: Crappy Thunderbird is now blocking c    |
|    20 Jan 26 19:55:06    |
      XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird, news.software.readers       From: nospam@needed.invalid              On Tue, 1/20/2026 12:01 AM, Cheep Cheep... wrote:                     > It is definitely Thunderbird doing it. A brand new install on a brand new       VM will exhibit the exact same behavior.        > It does not occur on any other news software.              The server and the server administrator control crossposting.       Using CleanFeed and SpamAssassin, they can also add arbitrary       rules concerning content. (The original CleanFeed had a       rule to block Nike running shoe adverts :-) As a demo filter.)              Some of the servers had additional filtering added, when       the ThaiSpam event occurred. That was a flood attack on       select groups. That's the event that caused Google to shut       down the NNTP interface to groups.google.com . It caused       one other free server to go "Read Only". The server administrator       sets it to ReadOnly, Thunderbird does not do that.              You can set up a test server, an INND, and do some better       quality controlled testing. When you first start running       the server, it has very few crosspost rules. The server       might be limited to crosspost of twelve by default, and       that's a global rule for all groups.              That's the kind of control you need over the materials,       to be making claims of "this and that". Nobody here believes       you, because we know how it works.              The USENET clients have a really easy job. The user types       shit in the window, the USENET client copies that into       a block of text and sends it. The server decides to accept       it, or reject it (along with a numeric error code). You can       study this, by setting your clients for Port 119 and using       Wireshark to record the (plaintext) packets.              To prove the honesty of the client, use Wireshark. Wireshark       will record the Newsgroups: line being sent off in your posting.       This *proves* that Thunderbird did not modify the group list.       It is right in the Wireshark trace. Right after this is sent,       the server can send "123 Excessive Crosspost" back to you, and that       is the server doing the parsing and analysis regarding the       server-enforced crosspost rule. Each group can have a custom       rule regarding when to reject a message. And by using Port 119,       this is available for you to read, in (relatively) plain English.               Newsgroups: alt.comp.software.thunderbird,news.software.reader       ,alt.comp.os.windows-11              More info about Wireshark, here.               https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireshark               Paul              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca