XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-10
From: this@ddress.is.invalid
Maria Sophia wrote:
> Frank Slootweg wrote:
> > Please don't spoil his rant with facts from the real world.
'Convenient', dishonest, silent snip of rest of text/arguments duly
noted.
> Please do not describe an intelligent technical description of how to
> properly set up a computer or phone as a "rant", Frank.
There was no "intelligent technical description". There was only a
rant and AJL's response. So I called a spade a spade.
> Just stop it with your incessant personal-attack childishness.
As all others who emit the personal-attack fallacy, the "childishness"
is all yours.
> It's always you who throws the first punch, Frank.
I don't think I was the one throwing slurs about "slums", so remember,
if I 'throw a punch', it's always *after* *your* first.
> But I'm not responding to your never-ending personal attacks, Frank.
> I'm just asking you politely and publicly to cut it out.
You obviously *are* responding, like you do every time, because you
can't handle being talked back at.
> Stick to the technical topic, Frank.
> If you have nothing technical to say, Frank, then please refrain from
> personal attacks simply because you can't address the technical issues.
There wasn't one, only your slurs.
> You don't have to agree that people who have good privacy practices have no
> need for silly biometric gimmicks, but you should at least attempt to
> understand the value of encrypted containers (e.g., Veracrypt) and
> encrypted databases (e.g., KeepassDX).
Well, 'silly gimmicks' like encryption are unneeded if you use PIN or
biometrics, etc.. (And understand how Android phones *actually* work.)
But anything you don't use (read: understand) is wrong, isn't it?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
