Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.comp.os.windows-11    |    Steaming pile of horseshit Windows 11    |    4,969 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,362 of 4,969    |
|    Carlos E.R. to Paul    |
|    Re: But is UseNet "Social Media"??    |
|    02 Feb 26 15:51:29    |
      XPost: alt.comp.linux       From: robin_listas@es.invalid              On 2026-02-02 14:54, Paul wrote:       > On Mon, 2/2/2026 6:39 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote:       >       >> In the subject of winmodems, I bought one by mistake. At that time I       >> double booted to Linux, and that blasted thing would not work in Linux at       all.       >> I think I resold it to a friend what was a happy Windows user.       >       > Modems were never a lot of fun at the best of times.       >       > I had two modems with datapumps, one each from the different       > modem factions. If I was "dialing into a Livingston front end",       > there was a modem for that, and there was another modem       > for the other flavors of front ends (modem pool).       >       > I think if you mixed the wrong modem types together,       > there would be a spiral of death, where the datarate       > would drop, until the datarate dropped so low, it would       > do a disconnect. And this is because if conditions improve,       > the bins that weren't being used, would not be recommissioned.       > And thus, a connection could only go downhill.       >       > My modems may have been flashed once or twice. I needed to       > flash them, for them to run at 56K. And I think a typical       > good day with the modem, was 43.3 or so. The line to the       > CO was likely too long, to support more than that. They used       > to connect a tank of dry nitrogen to our "wire bundle"       > in the manhole, and leave the gas running for a couple       > days, to "dry the lines". And this would help bring my line       > back to 43.3K again. I would occasionally have it drop all       > the way to 33.6K because of line conditions.       >       > I had to disconnect the household phone wiring, drill a wire up       > through the computer room floor, and run a brand new phone wire       > up into the computer room. And that's how I got the ability       > to run at 43.3 . You had to fight every inch of       > the way with that crap.       >       > My manager at work, when he had to debug his damn modem,       > there was corrosion in some phone wires where they passed       > through the foundation wall.       >       > "Good riddance, to bad rubbish."       >       > I don't recollect anyone lamenting that their modem was       > in the junk room now :-)              I had two lost battles that I remember. One was that I got a win-modem       that would not work in Linux, except at a low speed. 9600? Then I       learned that I needed an external modem to be sure it had the whole       hardware.              Later I had another trouble with a modem of about 30000 or 40000 bps.       The box said compatible with certain protocol that I have forgotten the       name. Compatible, ie, not included. I had to buy another modem.              Finally, I got an V90 modem. Worked fine. I never improved it to V92.       I'm not sure I got the numbers right.                     Oh, and here we had (have?) to pay local phone calls, so we tried to       make our calls to Fidonet or Internet as short as possible.              --       Cheers, Carlos.       ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca