Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.comp.os.windows-11    |    Steaming pile of horseshit Windows 11    |    4,852 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,506 of 4,852    |
|    Carlos E.R. to All    |
|    Re: What IS "Social Media"??    |
|    07 Feb 26 13:40:11    |
      XPost: alt.comp.linux       From: robin_listas@es.invalid              On 2026-02-07 09:57, Daniel70 wrote:       > On 7/02/2026 12:34 am, Carlos E.R. wrote:       >> On 2026-02-06 11:15, Daniel70 wrote:       >>> On 6/02/2026 7:43 am, Carlos E.R. wrote:       >>>> On 2026-02-05 15:13, s|b wrote:       >>>>> On Thu, 5 Feb 2026 13:48:05 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote:       >>>>>> On 2026-02-01 09:21, Daniel70 wrote:       >>>>>       >>>>>>> Cross-posted to Linux and Win-11 NGs       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> As may here would be aware, last December, the Australian       >>>>>>> Government brought in Legislation to limit the access to       >>>>>>> "Social Media" for those under 16 years of age.       >>>>>> Spain just announced (in the Dubai Summit) it is going to do       >>>>>> the same. The companies, like X, must actually ensure the age       >>>>>> of the person before granting access. Method not specified,       >>>>>> but clicking somewhere is not accepted as valid check.       >>>>> 8< snip >8       >>>>>       >>>>> This is not "to protect the children" as they claim. Children       >>>>> still get access by VPN or even by putting make-up on their       >>>>> face to look older (this is proven to fool the age detection)       >>>>> or by using their parent's account with their approval.       >>>>       >>>> Parents here are asking for this. It is hard to prohibit your kid       >>>> to access the phone, "because all my friends have it". When it is       >>>> prohibited for everybody, it is easier. Nobody has access.       >>>       >>> And, if the Parents then end up with troubled kids, they (the       >>> parents) have no one to blame but themselves.       >>>       >>> "My little Darlings wouldn't do THAT!!"       >>       >> Why would the kids be troubled because not having social media? I       >> didn't have them.       >       > Did the 'other' Social Media exist back then??              No mobile phones. No internet. No computers, actually.              >       >> Rich people from the California tech valley prohibit their children       >> from being educated with computers and insist on paper. They would       >> know!       >>       > Yeap, they should (and do!!).                     --       Cheers, Carlos.       ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca