Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.comp.os.windows-11    |    Steaming pile of horseshit Windows 11    |    4,852 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,534 of 4,852    |
|    Daniel70 to Carlos E.R.    |
|    Re: What IS "Social Media"??    |
|    08 Feb 26 19:28:12    |
      XPost: alt.comp.linux       From: daniel47@nomail.afraid.org              On 7/02/2026 11:40 pm, Carlos E.R. wrote:       > On 2026-02-07 09:57, Daniel70 wrote:       >> On 7/02/2026 12:34 am, Carlos E.R. wrote:       >>> On 2026-02-06 11:15, Daniel70 wrote:       >>>> On 6/02/2026 7:43 am, Carlos E.R. wrote:       >>>>> On 2026-02-05 15:13, s|b wrote:       >>>>>> On Thu, 5 Feb 2026 13:48:05 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote:       >>>>>>> On 2026-02-01 09:21, Daniel70 wrote:       >>>>>>       >>>>>>>> Cross-posted to Linux and Win-11 NGs       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> As may here would be aware, last December, the Australian       >>>>>>>> Government brought in Legislation to limit the access to       >>>>>>>> "Social Media" for those under 16 years of age.       >>>>>>> Spain just announced (in the Dubai Summit) it is going to do       >>>>>>> the same. The companies, like X, must actually ensure the age       >>>>>>> of the person before granting access. Method not specified,       >>>>>>> but clicking somewhere is not accepted as valid check.       >>>>>> 8< snip >8       >>>>>>       >>>>>> This is not "to protect the children" as they claim. Children       >>>>>> still get access by VPN or even by putting make-up on their       >>>>>> face to look older (this is proven to fool the age detection)       >>>>>> or by using their parent's account with their approval.       >>>>>       >>>>> Parents here are asking for this. It is hard to prohibit your kid       >>>>> to access the phone, "because all my friends have it". When it is       >>>>> prohibited for everybody, it is easier. Nobody has access.       >>>>       >>>> And, if the Parents then end up with troubled kids, they (the       >>>> parents) have no one to blame but themselves.       >>>>       >>>> "My little Darlings wouldn't do THAT!!"       >>>       >>> Why would the kids be troubled because not having social media? I       >>> didn't have them.       >>       >> Did the 'other' Social Media exist back then??       >       > No mobile phones. No internet. No computers, actually.              I was using an Apple IIE clone (Brand name ZEUS, I think.) in late 1983       for work purposes .... No Internet connection though!              >>> Rich people from the California tech valley prohibit their children       >>> from being educated with computers and insist on paper. They would       >>> know!       >>>       >> Yeap, they should (and do!!).       --       Daniel70              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca