XPost: alt.autos.toyota.camry, alt.autos.toyota, rec.autos.tech   
   From: demi@moore.net   
      
   On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 15:55:58 -0500, "C. E. White"   
    wrote:   
      
   >   
   >"Ashton Crusher"  wrote in message   
   >news:cn35j5tjk6f681hu0lprg51n2hbnhd0ang@4ax.com...   
   >   
   >> There is VERY little difference.  It's mostly perception and   
   >> preference based on the quality problems of the domestics one or two   
   >> decades ago.  People have long memories.  In the 70's you could figure   
   >> on something going wrong with your domestic several times a year.  Now   
   >> it's pretty rare.   
   >   
   >In the eighty I damn sure could count on something going wrong with my   
   >Toyota three or four times a year. Finally fixed it my getting a Ford. Trips   
   >to the shop for repairs immeadiately went to zero per year. So don't tell me   
   >how great Toyotas were in the 70's and 80's. They built some real POS just   
   >like every other manufacturer.   
   >   
   >Ed   
      
      
   You won't hear me tell you how great the Toyota's was.  I have never   
   been impressed by them.  Several years ago my Boss bought a Camry.   
   After hearing so much good stuff about Toyota's I was prepared to be   
   impressed when he drove to lunch.  It was as dull a car as I think I   
   had ridden in in years and basically seemed no different in anyway   
   then any number of chevys and fords I'd been in.  I know the couple of   
   imports I've had were not at all impressive as far as durability and   
   had nothing else special going for them either.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)