On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:00:16 -0400, Archon   
    wrote:   
      
   >On 8/26/2010 8:57 AM, Airport Shuttle wrote:   
   >> Replace the two and make the good tire your spare. I would recommend if   
   >> you have a vehicle that must have the same tread style and depth put all   
   >> five tire in rotation so if you have this problem the spare is ready to   
   >> go.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >Hi Thanks for the reply, I know how to solve the problem although I'm   
   >going to be in for 2 tires, but my question is Why? what is the reason   
   >for any adverse effect on the drivetrain? I thought someone would maybe   
   >have great insight into what the detrimental effects would be.   
   >   
   >Regarding using the spare in rotation, in an ideal world yes, but in   
   >most cases when buying a used vehicle the spare is often a different   
   >brand, almost always unused and often obsolete.   
      
      
   OK I'll explain it.Traction control and antilock braking, and to a   
   lesser degree, Stability control, work by sensing wheel rotation   
   speed. A bigger tire (un-worn) turns slightly slower than the smaller   
   tire at the same speed - so the ABS thinks that tire is starting to   
   lock up, and traction control thinks it's the tire with the best   
   traction. Hard on brakes when traction control brakes the other 3   
   wheels it thinks are spinning.   
   Also, different sised tires on the same drive axle makes the   
   differential constantly "work" and with Limited Slip (or Posi-Traction   
   as it used to be called) there can be issues with the diff locking,   
   trying to keep both wheels going the same speed.   
   With All Wheel Drive, a difference between front and rear wheel   
   diameters has the same effect on the inter-axle differential if so   
   equipped, and on the transfer case. Just more wear and tear all around   
   - both on the differentials, transfer case, and tires   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|