On Thu, 19 May 2016 13:58:48 -0400, Just Passing Through
wrote:
>On 05/19/2016 12:50 PM, clare@snyder.on.ca wrote:
>> On Thu, 19 May 2016 08:29:29 -0400, Just Passing Through
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/16/2014 04:39 PM, tabernacle12@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> What kind of lifespan on those hdlgts,burning all the time.does that
affect the insurance coverage?
>>>
>>> I have a 2003 GMC Jimmy also and on it I never had to change a light.
>>> Consumption is obviously an issue. The rest depends on where you are, if
>>> I were to disable mine the cops would pull me over and award me a
>>> 48-hours-to-restore order. I will disable it on my Tundra regardless but
>>> with a switch or something. Daytime running lights actually mask other
>>> and much more vulnerable traffic like bikers and pedestrians out of the
>>> driver's *brightness depth of field* so they are essentially a really
>>> irresponsible and stupid marketting gimmick sometimes enforced by law.
>>> There is already a movement afoot to fight it (google up DTRL and such).
>>>
>> My 1996 bFord Ranger with 343000km almost incredibly still has the
>> original headlights. The only bulb I know was replaced was one of the
>> brake lamp bulbs.
>>
>> The truck is Canadian so has DRLs.
>>
>> There is no such thing as "need to disable daytime running lights".
>>
>> And dispite your "opinion" they do have dafety advantages. I won't get
>> caught up in the old arguement, but as a competetive rallye driver wat
>> back in the seventies I have been a :daykighter" fot 45 years.
>
>Then don't join the fight, I already have, been driving for 60 years
>BTW, not one accident, in case that would mean anything.
>
Not far behind you and it doesn't meen a thing., and you are fighting
a loosing battle
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
