XPost: uk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics   
   XPost: aus.politics   
   From: Iron_White@Systemic_Patriotism.KMA   
      
   On Sat, 10 Sep 2022 09:18:16 +1000, "Rod Speed"   
    wrote:   
      
   >On Sat, 10 Sep 2022 07:51:01 +1000,  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Sat, 10 Sep 2022 07:43:36 +1000, "Rod Speed"   
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Sat, 10 Sep 2022 05:21:29 +1000,  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Sat, 10 Sep 2022 04:47:21 +1000, "Rod Speed"   
   >>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>> Those were the Firm's rules, not HM's.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Wrong, she clearly changed her mind with Big Ears   
   >>>>> and ordered him to marry Camilla eventually.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Doesn't count.  Second marriage.  The first, to an Anglican virgin   
   >>>> gave him the heirs he was required to sire.   
   >>>   
   >>> He could have done that with Camilla and the current   
   >>> king/queen should never get any say on who might be   
   >>> more likely to produce heirs.   
   >   
   >> No, he could not.  That would have been illegal   
   >   
   >How odd that it wasn't yesterday. No law changed about that.   
   >   
   >> and the heirs  illegitimate.   
   >   
   >BULLSHIT.   
   >   
   >> This doesn't meant certain archaic laws can't be changed by Parliament   
   >> and the Crown but the laws that were contemporaneous have to be   
   >> followed.   
   >   
   >There was no such law at the time.   
      
   They must obey the rules if they want to suck on the public teat.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)