XPost: uk.legal, soc.culture.israel, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns, can.politics, alt.survival   
   XPost: soc.culture.jewish, talk.politics.misc   
   From: thickirish@cunt.com   
      
   Abstract   
      
   From 1940 to 1943, Rudolf Höss was the commandant of the infamous   
   Auschwitz Camp. Today’s orthodox narrative has it that during this   
   time, some 500,000 people were killed at Auschwitz in gas chambers.   
   Yet when Höss was captured after the war, he confessed to having   
   killed some 2,500,000 during that time. 40 years later, it was   
   revealed that Höss had been severely tortured by his British   
   interrogators. This is an excerpt of the upcoming study by Carlo   
   Mattogno. It tells the gripping story of Höss’s capture and   
   mistreatments, and presents the texts of the various “confessions”   
   which the British extorted from Höss while in their custody.   
      
   In the Preface to the complete English translation of Rudolf Höss’s   
   notes which he wrote while in Polish custody in Cracow, Steven   
   Paskuly, editor of the work, writes that they “are perhaps the most   
   important document attesting the Holocaust” (Paskuly, p. 11). In his   
   introduction, he adds (ibid., p. 21):   
      
   “There are fanatical groups in the United States, France, and even   
   Australia who call themselves ‘The Revisionist Historians.’ They   
   actually propose that Höss never wrote these documents – that they are   
   a fraud. They also stated that even if the documents were written by   
   Höss, they were obviously done under duress from the ‘Communist   
   authorities’ in Poland. The ‘research’ and the conclusions of these   
   ‘historians’ are absolute rubbish.”   
      
   It is not worth responding to accusations apparently arising from   
   crude ignorance, which extends even to basic notions of current   
   orthodox Holocaust historiography, as I will show below. It is   
   worthwhile, however, to highlight Paskuly’s statement that the former   
   commander of Auschwitz “fails to mention that the camp regulations and   
   punishments were formulated by Höss himself” (ibid., p. 22), where he   
   confounds Höss’s Crakow writing titled “Lagerordnung für die   
   Konzentrationslager”[1] (translated by Paskuly as “Rules and   
   Regulations for Concentration Camps”; ibid., pp. 209-218), which Höss   
   had jotted down from memory (see Chapter III.1.), with the 1941   
   “Dienstvor­schrift für Konzentrationslager (Lagerordnung)” (“Service   
   Regulations for Concentration Camps (Camp Regulations)”), of which   
   only the title page and the table of contents are known.[2]   
      
   Already in 1987, I published a book dedicated to Höss’s various   
   post-war statements (Mattogno 1987). It listed 60 objections   
   characterized by internal contradictions and insurmountable   
   contradictions to the orthodox holocaust narrative of that time, thus   
   showing that “the former commander of Auschwitz lied on all essential   
   points of his ‘eye-witness testimony,’ which must therefore be   
   rejected as a vulgar fraud.” The tortures inflicted by the British on   
   Höss at the time, which in 1987 had already been documented, were   
   therefore not mentioned a priori in order to invalidate Höss’s   
   declarations, but a posteriori in order to explain the contradictions   
   and absurdities found in his statements.   
      
   In the present study, for which I had access to an enormously larger   
   documentation, I approach the topic from a different angle. The   
   fundamental problem which no one has ever considered is whether the   
   core of Höss’s first statements mirrored reality, or whether it   
   mirrored some preordained “truth” which the British questioning Höss   
   forced him to comply with in order to “confirm” it. In other words:   
   did those statements come from Höss or from his torturers? Hence, are   
   they true or not? And what is the relationship between Höss’s first   
   statements and those he made later?   
      
   This study is a well-founded and documented answer to these questions.   
      
   PART ONE: RUDOLF HÖSS’S STATEMENTS   
   I. Arrest and First Statement to the British   
   1. The Arrest   
   On March 15, 1946, the Field Security Section 92 summarized the events   
   of Rudolf Höss’s arrest with reference to a report dated 13 November   
   1945:[3]   
      
   “After five months of continuous investigations, interrogations and   
   extensive searches, this Section has succeeded in arresting SS   
   Obersturmbannfuehrer HOESS Rudolf Franz Ferdinand, who commanded the   
   notorious AUSCHWITZ Concentration Camp which was built under his   
   supervision and who, in 1943, became chief of Amt 1 of Amtsgruppe D   
   (Inspectorate of Concentration Camps) in the SS Wirtschafts und   
   Verwaltungs Hauptamt. [4]   
      
   As mentioned in the above quoted previous report, HOESS’ wife and her   
   five children were located in this Section’s area (Sugar Factory, ST   
   MICHAELISDONN. SUEDERDITMARSCHEN).   
      
   When last interrogated in November 1945, Frau HOESS stated that she   
   had last seen her husband in RENDSBURG on 30 April 1945. By assessing   
   various psychological aspects of her story, members of this Section   
   gained the firm impression that she was lying.   
      
   After careful plans for her re-interrogation, based on data   
   accumulated during the elapsed five months, had been worked out, Frau   
   HOESS was arrested during the night of 5 Mar 46. It was only at 1600   
   hrs on the 11 Mar 46 that she finally broke down and admitted having   
   been visited by HOESS in ST MICHAELISDONN in July 1945, that she had   
   communicated with him later and that she knew his present whereabouts.   
   She named as his address – GOTTRUPEL near FLENSBURG, c/o the farmer,   
   Hans Peter HANSEN.”   
      
   Höss’s wife, Hedwig, was therefore arrested in the middle of the   
   night, obviously in order to terrorize her and her five children, and   
   “she finally[!] broke down” six days later. We will see later what   
   methods were used to achieve this.   
      
   The British had been tracking down Höss for months. A “Report on   
   search for Obersturmbannführer SS – HÖSS and investigation of alleged   
   Nazi cell in ST MICHAELISDONN,” signed with “Sgt. 92 Field Security   
   Section (Southern Sub-Area),” undated but written sometime between   
   late October 1945 and prior to Höss’s arrest, begins with this   
   statement:   
      
   “339 FS Section, BRUNSBÜTTEL had received information via Umland   
   agency, that the wife of SS Obersturmbannführer HÖSS ex-Kommandant of   
   the notorious AUSCHWITZ Concentration Camp, was living in the Sugar   
   Factory, ST MICHAELISDONN. Two NCO’s of that Section interviewed Frau   
   HÖSS, found her in possession of astonishingly large quantities of   
   dresses, furs, cloth and other valuables, but she disclaimed all   
   knowledge of the whereabouts of her husband. Some time after this, an   
   officer of JAG (War Crimes) contacted 339 FSS and was eventually,   
   since this Detachment had arrived in the area, passed on to us.”   
      
   On October 24, 1945, the Field Security Section 92 organized a raid at   
   the sugar factory of St Michaelisdonn, during which they interviewed   
   all employees as well as Höss’s wife. She made detailed statements   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)