XPost: uk.legal, soc.culture.jewish, alt.revisionism   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats   
   From: void@invalid.noy   
      
   by David M. Zsutty   
      
      
   The first and fiercest punishment ought to fall first on the traitor,   
   second on the enemy. — Corneliu Zelea Codreanu   
      
   I was cautiously optimistic about America First Legal (AFL). Their   
   mission statement proudly proclaims in part: “We believe that all   
   Americans deserve a government that puts their needs, their interests,   
   and their country FIRST.” It was founded in 2021 by Stephen Miller,   
   who had a strong track record on immigration from his time in the   
   Trump administration. Miller touts AFL as “the long-awaited answer to   
   the ACLU.” To AFL’s credit, they have done a lot of good work.   
      
   On April 26, however, AFL posted on X that they had “. . . sued   
   Biden’s Department of Education for illegally hiding records regarding   
   the pro-Hamas college rallies with foreign extremists happening across   
   the country. Many of these students are here on F-1 student visas.   
   Hamas sympathizers should be deported!”   
      
   Sadly, America First Legal has become illustrative of the fact that we   
   cannot work with Zionists. In an alliance with Zionists, we will   
   always be the junior partner in the relationship — even though white   
   Americans should be the senior partner because this is our country.   
   When Jews run white societies and organizations, white resources will   
   be diverted to serving Jewish interests. And whenever our interests   
   collide, Jewish interests will take precedence every single time.   
      
   AFL’s latest lawsuit may seem good at first glance. A lot of Muslim   
   students are Leftist troublemakers who might as well wear rainbow   
   burkas, and they take the seats of white students in the zero-sum game   
   of college admissions. Deporting them would further trigger the Left,   
   causing more conflict and chaos, which would be to our advantage.   
      
   This is all a trap. Stephen Miller is Jewish, and he is pursuing   
   Israeli interests at the expense of our interests.   
      
   First, he is smearing the optics of the broader Right by associating   
   them with genocide in Gaza and snipers on college rooftops, and during   
   an election year at that. It is likely that the Democrats will manage   
   to damage their own optics even more, but this is not an assumption a   
   serious Republican should make.   
      
   Second, he is undermining the First Amendment. As much as I do not   
   believe that free speech should encompass foreigners coming to America   
   to mouth off at white people and subvert our country, that’s obviously   
   not what this is about. I doubt Miller ever seriously pushed for   
   deporting foreign students who were anti-white during Black Lives   
   Matters’ ascendancy, just as Governor Abbott of Texas has sent more   
   troops to college campuses to protect the feelings of entitled Jewish   
   students and professors — many of whom revel in anti-white hate — than   
   to protect our southern border. The AFL’s lawsuit is part of a broader   
   trend of Zionist Republicans (pardon the redundancy) trying to carve   
   out a novel exception for anti-Semitism within the First Amendment   
   contrary to its black-letter meaning, common sense, our history and   
   traditions, and mountains of caselaw. In politics, the who is more   
   important than the what or the how, and the who here is the Jews — not   
   whites, and not even generic Americans. Free speech is the bedrock of   
   freedom, but Miller is happy to throw it out the moment it becomes   
   inconvenient for Jews.   
      
   The First Amendment issue flows into the third issue. This will   
   solidify tactics to suppress dissent which were originally and almost   
   exclusively used against whites, and which will probably be used   
   against us again. At the very least, the threat of their use will   
   continue to dampen our freedom of speech and assembly.   
      
   Charlottesville was a trap in which Leftists conspired with the police   
   to cause chaos so that they could then complain about it and file   
   lawsuits. Key to this was disingenuously attacking everyone involved   
   in the event as a Hollywood villain ready to fire up the gas chambers   
   simply because they opposed the destruction of historical monuments.   
   It helped that a suspicious person brought a suspicious flag with   
   suspiciously fresh creases, and there was a dead body to   
   performatively mourn. This allowed the Left to isolate their target   
   for lawfare and cancel culture.   
      
   January 6 was another trap in which the regime had dozens of agents   
   present to stir things up, and the police antagonized and lured the   
   crowd into the “sacred temple of Our Democracy™.” The media then   
   comically exaggerated their actions and slurred them as   
   insurrectionists with operatic levels of choreography.   
      
   I don’t need my tarot cards to predict that the campus protests will   
   see a repeat of these same tactics of police brutality, entrapment,   
   false flags, and agent provocateurs. They’re already using “Hamas   
   supporter” as a slur to isolate their targets, just as they have   
   previously done with “neo-nazi” and “insurrectionist” — and with the   
   same connotations of violence and extremism.   
      
   This is going to end with blood and mass incarcerations — for real,   
   not like the catch-and-release of the BLM era. These tactics will   
   probably enjoy wild success, because while the nationalists and MAGA   
   crowd have already gone through painful experiences with the   
   powers-that-be, the Left has no experience at all, because thus far   
   they have fought in tandem with regime interests — or at least could   
   be co-opted for regime interests. I almost pity them.   
      
   This does not mean that we should support the protestors. Both sides   
   are anti-white, and thus our objective enemy. We might want to   
   encourage them from the sidelines, because in a fight between various   
   anti-white factions, whites win. But we should not allow either side   
   to dragoon our scarce resources into a conflict that is no more in our   
   interests than the Iraq War.   
      
   In the wake of October 7, some have suggested that we ally with   
   Leftists and Muslims due to their imminent legal persecution. I would   
   welcome this in theory, but in practice I am opposed, because they   
   could never drop their anti-white hate, as it is the cornerstone of   
   their ideology. Cooperating with the protestors would just get us a   
   knife — or a scimitar — in our backs.   
      
   Cooperating with the Zionists is untenable for the same reasons. They   
   might be more polished and sophisticated, but their actions show that   
   they see us merely as a resource to exploit. The tactics of state   
   oppression that they are using against the campus protestors today   
   were being used against us yesterday, and will be used against us   
   tomorrow as well. Some of us cheered when the PATRIOT Act was first   
   employed against Muslims, but we are wiser now. If history is any   
   indication, the anti-Semitism exception to the First Amendment will be   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)