XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc, alt.politics.immigration   
   XPost: uk.politics.misc, alt.politics.uk, alt.politics   
   From: d@ray   
      
   Record-high immigration has failed to boost the British economy while   
   exacerbating the housing crisis and placing increasing pressure on public   
   services, according to a comprehensive and damning new report.   
      
   The Taking Back Control report, released on Wednesday by think tank the   
   Centre for Policy Studies (CPS), also highlighted the dramatic increase in   
   the non-White British population, the extremely uneven geographic   
   distribution of recently arrived immigrants, the vast difference in   
   contributions made by migrants from different regions, and two decades of   
   broken promises by Conservative and Labour governments alike.   
      
   The authors, former immigration minister Robert Jenrick MP, former minister   
   Neil O’Brien MP, and CPS Research Director Karl Williams, recommended a   
   drastic intake reduction, caps on main migrant routes, and the creation of   
   a new government department to control immigration.   
      
   Mr Jenrick said: “It would be unforgivable if the Government did not use   
   the time before the general election to undo the disastrous post-Brexit   
   liberalisations that betrayed the express wishes of the British public for   
   lower immigration.   
      
   “The changes we propose today would finally return numbers to the   
   historical norm and deliver the highly-selective, highly-skilled   
   immigration system voters were promised. These policies could be   
   implemented immediately and would consign low-skilled mass migration to the   
   past.”   
      
   Mr O’Brien MP argued that the report showed that mass immigration has not   
   provided the benefits its advocates claim, pointing to a significant   
   slowdown in GBP per capita growth.   
      
   “[Mass immigration] has also put significant strain on public services and   
   infrastructure: migrants may bring skills with them but they cannot bring   
   additional roads, school places, or GPs surgeries. Unprecedented levels of   
   migration have put upward pressure on rents and house prices,” he said.   
      
   “The public have repeatedly voted for parties who commit to controlling   
   immigration, now we need to deliver.”   
      
   Mr Williams said that the huge disparities between the contributions made   
   by migrants from different countries showed that immigration was not the   
   “unqualified benefit to the public purse” that Treasury and most of the   
   government have long claimed.   
      
   “The average migrant from New Zealand or the Philippines is almost twice as   
   likely to be in work as a new arrival from Iraq, and 50% more likely than a   
   migrant from Bangladesh or Somalia,” he said.   
      
   “The pressure on housing can also differ even for those from similar   
   regions – for example, only 6% of people from India live in social housing   
   compared to 15% from Pakistan and 34% from Bangladesh.”   
      
   The report warned that without the author’s suggested changes, immigration   
   levels were unlikely to decrease over the longer term, and that “the   
   demographics of [British] schools indicate that further rapid change is   
   already baked in” – 73% of the students in East Ham, London, have a first   
   language other than English.   
      
   “90% of those in England and Wales aged 65 and over describe themselves as   
   White British, compared to two thirds of those aged 45 or younger,” the   
   report notes.   
      
   “When you combine age and place, the variation becomes even greater. A   
   45-year-old Londoner picked at random has a roughly 3 in 10 chance of   
   identifying as White British. For a 65-year-old in the North East, the odds   
   would be 49 out of 50.   
      
   “Between 2001 and 2021, the proportion of the population who do not   
   identify as White British more than doubled, from 12.5% to 25.6%.”   
      
   The report also analysed the “immense gap” between the worldviews of   
   British parliament and the voters when it comes to immigration.   
      
   “In every general election since 1992m the winning party has promised tight   
   control and in every election since 2010 to actively reduce overall   
   migration. The democratic problem arises from the fact that having made   
   such promises, politicians have then gone on to break them – over and over   
   again, for 30 years,” the authors wrote.   
      
   “Within government there is a perception across multiple departments that   
   immigration is an unqualified economic good, at least in terms of meetings   
   the objectives of that particular department.”   
      
   The authors found that public trust in politicians has plummeted as a   
   result, which if not regained will lead to the rise of a populist political   
   party similar to those surging in EU countries at present.   
      
   “[The fall in public trust] should be a cause of concern to anyone who   
   believes in democracy as a political system and is worried about the   
   diminishing regard in which it is now held,” the report stated.   
      
   “Failure to uphold promises on migration has been utterly corrosive to   
   people’s confidence that their vote has some say in the running of the   
   country.”   
      
   All graphs in this article are credited to the Centre for Policy Studies   
   report Taking Back Control: Why Britain needs a better approach to   
   immigration   
      
      
      
      
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)