home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   soc.culture.british      British culture (and odd mannerisms)      77,647 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 77,395 of 77,647   
   abelard to Joe   
   Re: Statement on the Southport Murders   
   05 Aug 24 22:41:20   
   
   XPost: alt.politics.immigration, talk.politics.misc, uk.politics.misc   
   XPost: alt.politics.uk   
   From: abelard@abelard.org   
      
   On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 21:12:14 +0100, Joe  wrote:   
      
   >On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 15:46:32 -0000 (UTC)   
   >Incubus  wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   >>   
   >> Let's not forget that the Rwandan killer's identity was only revealed   
   >> because it went about on social media that he was an asylum seeker.   
   >>   
   >> According to information that I saw, the Police are under pressure to   
   >> pass this off as a "mental health" issue.  However, the killer had   
   >> become radicalised within Islam and had a visit from the Police just   
   >> two weeks before he went on a killing spree due to his extremism.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >   
   >There would be less trouble overall if information was released to the   
   >public as soon as it became available. *Truthful* information. We might   
   >then feel that those who had given out the information were not   
   >obviously our enemies.   
   >   
   >Look at the Trump thing: there is still important information being   
   >kept back by the US government, such as how many shots were actually   
   >fired by the dead would-be assassin, and what kind of gun he had. There   
   >are officially no other people involved, so information is not being   
   >held back to help catch anyone else. The obvious conclusion drawn is   
   >that there *were* others involved, just as when Kennedy was murdered.   
   >   
   >The second-level conclusion is that such speculation is actively being   
   >sought in both cases. The rioting will rather conveniently lead to   
   >greater censorship and restrictions on *us*. Note that Starmer didn't   
   >say he was proposing action to make such murders less likely, but to   
   >make protests less likely. Yet again, the government, which largely   
   >consists of lawyers, will be pretending that more laws will stop   
   >criminals who don't obey the existing ones. It is only ever the   
   >law-abiding who are inconvenienced by laws, particularly by hasty and   
   >ill-thought-out laws.   
      
   indeed, the idiotic yobs are used to cotrol/restrict the masses   
      for the conveniences of the blob   
   not to control the yobs   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca