Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.culture.british    |    British culture (and odd mannerisms)    |    77,646 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 77,567 of 77,646    |
|    Susan Cohen to All    |
|    Zionism and Anti-Semitism: A Strange All    |
|    23 Aug 25 22:12:36    |
      [continued from previous message]              In the end, Pawel argues, “Paris changed Herzl, and French       anti-Semites undermined the ironic complacency of the Jewish would-be       non-Jew.” Yet Herzl was not entirely displeased with anti-Semitism. In       a private letter to Moritz Benedikt, written in the final days of       1892, he writes: “I do not consider the anti-Semitic movement       altogether harmful. It will inhibit the ostentatious flaunting of       conspicuous wealth, curb the unscrupulous behavior of Jewish       financiers, and contribute in many ways to the education of the Jews …       In that respect we seem to be in agreement.”              Herzl’s book Der Judenstaat (“The Jewish State”), was widely       disparaged by the leading Jews of the day, who viewed themselves as       French, German, English or Austrian citizens and Jews by religion —       with no interest in a separate Jewish state. Anti-Semites, on the       other hand, eagerly greeted Herzl’s work. Herzl’s arguments, Pawel       points out, were “all but indistinguishable from those used by the       anti-Semites.” One of the first reviews appeared in the       Westungarischer Grenzbote, an anti-Semitic journal published in       Bratislava by Ivan von Simonyi, a member of the Hungarian Diet. He       praised both the book and Herzl, and was so carried away with his       enthusiasm that he paid Herzl a personal visit. Herzl wrote in his       diary:              My weird follower, the Bratislava anti-Semite Ivan von Simonyi came to       see me. A hypermercurial, hyperloquacious sexagenerian with an uncanny       sympathy for the Jews. Swings back and forth between perfectly       rational talk and utter nonsense, believes in the blood libel and at       the same time comes up with the most sensible modern ideas. Loves me.              After the barbaric Kishinev pogrom of April 1901, when hundreds of       Jews were killed or wounded, Herzl came to Russia to barter with V. K.       Plehve, the Russian interior minister who had incited the pogrom.       Herzl told Jewish cultural leader Chaim Zhitlovsky: “I have an       absolutely binding promise from Plehve that he will procure a charter       for Palestine for us in 15 years at the outside. There is one       condition, however, the revolutionaries must stop their struggle       against the Russian government.”              Zhitlovsky, incensed at Herzl for dealing with a killer of Jews, and       aware that Herzl had been outsmarted, persuaded him to abandon the       idea. Still, the Zionist leaders in Russia agreed with the government       that the real responsibility for the pogroms rested with the Jewish       Bund, a socialist group urging democratic reforms in the Czarist       regime. Zionists wanted Jews to remain aloof from Russian politics       until it was time to leave for Palestine.              The head of the secret police in Moscow, S.V. Zubatov, was sympathetic       to Zionism as a way to silence Jewish opponents of the repressive       Czarist regime. In her book The Fate of the Jews, Roberta Strauss       Feuerlicht reports that              Zionism appealed greatly to police chief Zubatov, as it does to all       anti-Semites, because it takes the Jewish problem elsewhere. Both       Zubatov and the Zionists wanted to destroy the Bund, Zubatov to       protect his country, and the Zionists to protect theirs. Zionism’s       success is based on a Jewish misery index; the greater the misery, the       greater the wish to emigrate. The last thing the Zionists wanted was       to improve conditions in Russia. Zionists served Zubatov as police       spies and subverters of the Bund …              In his book Jewish History, Jewish Religion, Israel Shahak points out       that              Close relations have always existed between Zionists and anti-Semites;       exactly like some of the European conservatives, the Zionists thought       they could ignore the “demonic” character of anti-Semitism and use the       anti-Semites for their own purposes … Herzl allied himself with the       notorious Count von Plehve, the anti-Semitic minister of Tsar Nicholas       II; Jabotinsky made a pact with Petlyura, the reactionary Ukrainian       leader whose forces massacred some 100,000 Jews in 1918-1921 … Perhaps       the most shocking example of this type is the delight with which       Zionist leaders in Germany welcomed Hitler’s rise to power, because       they shared his belief in the primacy of “race” and his hostility to       the assimilation of Jews among “Aryans.” They congratulated Hitler on       his triumph over the common enemy — the forces of liberalism.              ‘We Jews’              Dr. Joachim Prinz, a German Zionist rabbi who subsequently emigrated       to the United States, where he became vice-chairman of the World       Jewish Congress and a leader in the World Zionist Organization,       published in 1934 a book Wir Juden (“We Jews”) to celebrate Hitler’s       so-called German Revolution and the defeat of liberalism. He wrote:              The meaning of the German Revolution for the German nation will       eventually be clear to those who have created it and formed its image.       Its meaning for us must be set forth there: the fortunes of liberalism       are lost. The only form of political life which has helped Jewish       assimilation is sunk.              The victory of Nazism ruled out assimilation and inter-religious       marriage as an option for Jews. “We are not unhappy about this,” said       Dr. Prinz. In the fact that Jews were being forced to identify       themselves as Jews, he saw “the fulfillment of our desires.” Further,       he states,              We want assimilation to be replaced by a new law: the declaration of       belonging to the Jewish nation and the Jewish race. A state built upon       the principle of the purity of nation and race can only be honored and       respected by a Jew who declares his belonging to his own kind. Having       so declared himself, he will never be capable of faulty loyalty       towards a state. The state cannot want other Jews but such as declare       themselves as belonging to their nation…              Dr. Shahak compares Prinz’s early sympathy for Nazis with that of many       who have embraced the Zionist vision, not fully understanding the       possible implications: “Of course, Dr. Prinz, like many other early       sympathizers and allies of Nazism, did not realize where that movement       was leading …”              Zionist-Nazi Alliance Proposal              Still, as late as January 1941, the Zionist group LEHI, one of whose       leaders, Yitzhak Shamir, was later to become a prime minister of       Israel, approached the Nazis, using the name of its parent       organization, the Irgun (NMO). The naval attaché in the German embassy       in Turkey transmitted the LEHI proposal to his superiors in Germany.       It read in part:              It is often stated in the speeches and utterances of the leading       statesmen of National Socialist Germany that a New Order in Europe       requires as a prerequisite the radical solution of the Jewish question       through evacuation. The evacuation of the Jewish masses from Europe is       a precondition for solving the Jewish question. This can only be made       possible and complete through the settlement of these masses in the       home of the Jewish people, Palestine, and through the establishment of       a Jewish state in its historic boundaries.              The LEHI proposal continues: “The NMO … is well acquainted with the       good will of the German Reich Government and its authorities towards       Zionist activity inside Germany and towards Zionist emigration plans.”       It goes on to state:              The establishment of the historical Jewish state on a national and       totalitarian basis and bound by a treaty with the German Reich would       be in the interests of strengthening the future German position of       power in the Near East … The NMO in Palestine offers to take an active       part in the war on Germany’s side … The cooperation of the Israeli              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca