XPost: soc.culture.scottish, soc.culture.british, soc.culture.irish   
   XPost: soc.culture.australian   
   From: grawillers@westnet.com.au   
      
   "Westprog"  wrote in message   
   news:f2l2hu$ibs$1@news.datemas.de...   
   >   
   > "Cory Bhreckan"  wrote in message   
   > news:Z1m3i.381$aj.224@trndny06...   
   >> sir.jpturcaud@neuf.fr wrote:   
   >> > On 18 mai, 15:00, "Adam Whyte-Settlar"    
   >> > wrote:   
   >> >> "Westprog"  wrote in message   
   >> >>   
   >> >> news:f2jtoh$mm2$1@news.datemas.de...   
   >> >>   
   >> >>   
   >> >>   
   >> >>> "Greatest Mining Pioneer of Australia of all Times"   
   >> >>>  wrote in message   
   >> >>> news:1179481291.409707.158820@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...   
   >> >>> ...   
   >> >>>> Another thing which is completely amazing is the fact that the  2   
   > main   
   >> >>>> towers went STRAIGHT DOWN, without swaying indeed and any of them at   
   >> >>>> all.   
   >> >>> Damn vertical gravity.   
   >   
   >> >> Ain't it a bitch?   
   >   
   >> >> 'Specially as they collapsed from the top down.   
   >> > You are either completely idiotic with your comments,   
   >   
   > One of is, that's for sure.   
   >   
   >> > or pissing in   
   >> > your pants by fear of saying something intelligent !   
   >   
   > What a great job it must be, to be the FBI agent responible for reading   
   > all   
   > the explanations as to why the WTC couldn't collapse like that.   
   >   
   > At least the homing device was a good idea. Normally the 911 people just   
   > recycle each others ideas. This one was a new one for me.   
   >   
   >> That's impossible, he lives in Australia. They're all bed wetters there.   
   >   
   > From his view, the towers fell upwards.   
      
   More sort of sideways really.   
      
   These kooks give us genuine conspiracy theorists a bad name.   
   I think that's perhaps the idea. Who's backing these loonies? Someone must   
   be putting a lot of money into it to divert people away from the truth I   
   reckon.   
   Who was responsible for the so-called 'security lapse' that permitted them   
   to be hit is well worth looking at, but hell no - let's waste everyone's   
   time with insane 'controlled demolition' stories while the culprits get away   
   with it.   
      
   I still think it's a little inconvenient that the towers both collapsed one   
   floor at a time from the top when controlled demolitions blow out the   
   bottom. I know it sounds crazy to some but  I have a hunch that the collapse   
   might have had something to do with two large fuel-laden jet airliners   
   crashing into them at several hundred miles per hour and then exploding. I   
   can't prove it of course but the theory definitely merits further   
   investigation in my opinion.   
   Is anyone checking it out?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)