XPost: soc.culture.scottish, soc.culture.irish, soc.culture.british   
   XPost: alt.religion.druid   
   From: fjmccall@gmail.com   
      
   max.it wrote:   
      
   >On Wed, 11 May 2011 19:12:14 -0700, Fred J. McCall   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>"Jeffrey Hamilton"  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>Fred J. McCall wrote:   
   >>>> Sidney Lambe  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> On alt.religion.druid, Fred J  McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> X-No-Archive: Yes   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> He's trying to hide his tracks.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> This from the guy posting under a fake name through an encrypted IP   
   >>>> with what is probably a fake email address....   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You thickies just really don't get the point of X-No-Archive, do you?   
   >>>   
   >>>Sure he does, Fredfredaka and he's correct, you _ARE_ trying to hide your   
   >>>tracks and you have been doing such since May 2009.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>Jesus, but you're a dumbass!   
   >>   
   >>Hint:  Nobody is required to honour X-No-Archive other than Google.   
   >   
   >Why only google?   
   >   
      
   Because they acquired Deja News.   
      
   >   
   >Don't think anyone was ever actually required to honour X Archive   
   >before.   
   >   
      
   Deja News was.   
      
   >   
   >Do usenet clients even have a user profile field for X Archive   
   >these days?   
   >   
      
   If they don't they are broken (and they're not 'user profile fields').   
      
   >   
   >Does modern server software even understand the   
   >instruction?   
   >   
      
   It's an optional tag, so some does something with it and some does not   
   and merely skips it.  Which was rather the point.   
      
   --   
   "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar   
    territory."   
                                         --G. Behn   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)