XPost: soc.culture.irish, alt.history.british, soc.culture.british   
   XPost: soc.culture.welsh   
   From: nospam@this.addy   
      
   Paul J Gans wrote:   
   > In alt.history.british William Black  wrote:   
   >> On 12/07/11 10:09, Surreyman wrote:   
   >>> On Jul 11, 11:37 am, William Black  wrote:   
   >>>> On 11/07/11 09:02, David H Singanas wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Do you reckon the Picts arrived before the Celts ?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The last thing I read about the Celts said that they're weren't an   
   >>>> ethnicity but a very popular culture,  something like American   
   >>>> culture is today, and there's no such thing as actual 'Celts'.   
   >   
   >>>   
   >>> Well, must admit I don't know much about the science of it.   
   >>> But there's the whole linguistic thing for a start - although that   
   >>> could of course be regional irrespective of 'race'.   
   >>> However, there have to be genes playing around somewhere - there are   
   >>> very distinctive body/facial shapes present that are regarded as   
   >>> Welsh (or whatever) v. Anglo-Saxon, Norman etc.   
   >   
   >> I think it was an article about the 'genes thing' I was reading.   
   >   
   >> It seems there's no 'Celtic' DNA.   
   >   
   > They wouldn't give it up without a fight eh?   
   >   
   > :-)   
      
      
   The whole world should know by now that there isn't one single pure   
   ethnicity living on this planet but carriers of the Cohen Modal Haplotype.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)