XPost: alt.religion.christian.adventist, alt.religion.christian.boston-church,   
   alt.religion.christian.baptist   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian.biblestudy   
   From: EliyahuSilver@Hotmail.com   
      
   perfectlyInnocent@as-if.com (Perfectly Innocent) wrote in message   
   news:...   
   > Hi Eliyahu,   
   >   
   > The webpage you gave, http://www.geocities.com/Metzad/Daniel9.htm   
   > has truth mixed with error. There is no "Christian interpretation   
   > of Daniel 9," i.e., there is no Christian consensus on the meaning   
   > of the prophecy of that chapter.   
   >   
   > Some interpretations are better than others. Scholars are united by   
   > grammatical-historical exegesis. A more accurate commentary on Daniel   
   > 9 is given here:   
   >   
   > http://www.everythingimportant.org/seventhdayAdventists/eschatology10.htm   
   >   
   > Thanks for your interest.   
   >   
   > Eugene Shubert   
   > http://www.everythingimportant.org   
      
   Bs'd   
      
   They need a whole lot of text to twist a simple profetie in JC.   
      
   And they use all the mistranslations I point out in my page, such as   
   the non existing connection between the 7 weeks and the 62 weeks, THE   
   messiah in stead of "A messiah", will be cut of "but not for himself"   
   in stead of "he will have nothing", and "the holy of holiest" always   
   in the OT applied to the tempel, becomes suddenly JC, "the sanctuary"   
   = the tempel, becomes "the Jewish people", because otherwise the   
   timeframe is totally wrong, etc.   
      
   It is a tremendously forced and twisted explanation.   
      
   Eliyahu   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)