XPost: alt.religion.christian.adventist, alt.religion.christian.boston-church,   
   alt.religion.christian.baptist   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian.biblestudy   
   From: EliyahuSilver@Hotmail.com   
      
   perfectlyInnocent@as-if.com (Perfectly Innocent) wrote in message   
   news:...   
   > Eliyahu,   
   >   
   > You say on your page http://www.geocities.com/Metzad/Daniel9.htm and I   
   > quote:   
   >   
   > "The prophecy says: 'And after the sixty-two weeks, an anointed one   
   > shall be cut off, and shall have nothing; and the people of the prince   
   > who is to come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary.'  So after   
   > the 7 and 62 weeks, in the 70th week, will a messiah be cut of[f] and   
   > the sanctuary, that is the Temple, destroyed."   
   >   
   > That's an interesting admission. Jesus appeared as a messiah after 69   
   > weeks when he, at the age of 30, was anointed by the Holy Spirit in   
   > baptism. He was cut off 3 and a half years later, i.e., in the middle   
   > of the 70th week, (having nothing). So your complaint is that God   
   > delayed His wrath and granted the Jews an extra 40 years to repent   
   > before He brought His severe indignation upon them, fulfilling exactly   
   > what Jesus predicted?   
   >   
   > http://www.everythingimportant.org/seventhdayAdventists/eschatology14.htm   
   >   
   > Eugene Shubert   
   > http://www.everythingimportant.org   
      
      
   Bs'd   
      
   My complaint is: A) JC was never a messiah, that is: He never was an   
   anointed king, and he never fulfilled the messianic prophecies, and B)   
   The destruction is 40 years too late, and the animal sacrifices did   
   not stop in 33, but also almost 40 years later.   
   So the Christian interpretation is WRONG.   
      
   Eliyahu   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)