[continued from previous message]
>Fine... I condemn EACH AND EVERY LINE of the many forms of the lie called
>the Jesuit Oath. The hatred within such a lie is to be completely condemned.
Susan responds:
Tell us about those lines as you went through all hell in your
obedience to the Jesuit Oath to show that we are the most hateful and
lying people in the world. What sense does it make constantly trailing
us line by line when we have killed no one?
Larson continues:
>I further condemn the hatred and malice in the people who manufactured such
>a lie.
Susan repeats again:
Expound upon it and compare those people who made the Oath to the hate
you all claimed and spent hours line by line trying to show that was
contained in us for being upset about killers both in history and
Seeber who just recently condemned human life.
In His Grace,
Susan
Question more forcefully represented in my questions against the
abominable Stephen Quist:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=group:alt.religion.christian.a
ventist+insubject:condemn+insubject:the+insubject:Jesuit+insubje
t:Oath&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=bdrj3vk1ignsva7sqfont0ve
6vsn19ihm%404ax.com&rnum=3
TAKE NOTE OF ALL HIS TACTICS!!!
Search Result 3
From: Susan Williams (salethiel77@rocketmail.com)
Subject: #HARD FOR JESUITS TO CONDEMN THE JESUIT OATH!!
This is the only article in this thread
View: Original Format
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist,
alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, tnn.religion.catholic
Date: 2003-01-30 19:31:53 PST
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 06:14:16 -0700, "Stephen Quist"
wrote:
>Susan Williams wrote:
>:: On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 07:59:37 -0700, "Stephen Quist"
>:: wrote:
>::
>::: Susan Williams wrote:
>::::: On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 06:47:12 -0700, "Stephen Quist"
>::::: wrote:
>:::::
>:::::: Susan Williams wrote: [regarding the Jesuit Oath]
>::::::
>:::::::: NO REASON HAS BEEN GIVEN YET FOR WHY SO MANY PEOPLE KEEP IT,
>:::::::: AND WHY THOSE SAME PEOPLE REFUSE TO CONDEMN THE HATE FOUND
>:::::::: WITHIN IT THOUGH OTHER DOCUMENTS AND OTHER CLAIMS ARE
>:::::::: CONDEMNED FOR HATE WITHOUT A PROBLEM!
Stephen Quist:
>:::::: What is it you want?
>::::::
>:::::: This?
>::::::
>:::::: I condemn the hate found in the so-called Jesuit Oath. I abjure
>:::::: it. That the Jesuit Oath is a fraud in no way diminishes the
>:::::: condemnation I give its spirit of hate.
>::::::
>:::::: I condemn the hate that drove someone to invent this fraud.
>::::::
>:::::: OK?
Susan Williams:
>::::: Can you be just a little more specific so that the time you used
>::::: to go nuts over out posts may somehow even hope to match up with
>::::: the worst and most hateful document found in the world today?
Stephen Quist:
>::: It stands condemned in its entirety. What is the point of condemning
>::: each of its vile clauses?
Susan Williams:
>:: First answer why you damned keepers of the Jesuit Oath found it
>:: necessary to condemn each and every movement of myself and Brother
>:: Ted and now reason with your Jesuit Oath selves to ask what is the
>:: point of condemning THE MOST HATEFUL DOCUMENT KNOWN TO MAN PIECE BY
>:: PIECE WITH EACH OF ITS VILE CLAUSES??
Stephen Quist using his supreme training in deceit to lengthen out an
argument continuing to ask the question:
>But we did condemn it. Entirely. Is there a point to going through
>it clause by vile clause?
Susan Williams has to repeat herself constantly:
What is the point going through us with accusations of insanity,
irrantionality, hate, and mental illness clause by clause again?
I mean, Antichrist Quist, WHY ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS WHEN THE JESUIT
OATH FREES YOU FROM DOING SO?
By the way, why did we have to time you sinister killers by the
calendar year before you even thought to condemn the most hateful
document known to man? What was all that stalling by telling us since
the document is fake it must not be commented upon?
Susan Williams:
>::::: Why no comment about the damned people who conceived it??
Stephen Quist:
>::: I did make a comment when I said, "I condemn the hate that drove
>::: someone to invent this fraud."
Susan Williams:
>:: Why couldn't you have just condemned Brother Ted and myself that way?
>:: Why couldn't your superb reasoning hold by just saying to your damned
>:: Jesuit Oath selves: "Ted McMillan and Susan stand condemned in their
>:: entirety. What is the point of condemning each and everything they
>:: do and trail their posts?"
Stephen Quist:
>I don't condemn you.
Susan Williams:
As I said before you decided to obey the Jesuit Oath again: Why
couldn't you have just condemned Brother Ted and myself that way?
Why couldn't your superb reasoning hold by just saying to your damned
Jesuit Oath selves: "Ted McMillan and Susan stand condemned in their
entirety. What is the point of condemning each and everything they do
and trail their posts?"
Stephen Quist:
>::: I condemn the person or people who
>::: strove to cast aspersions on faithful Catholics by inventing this
>::: document which was designed to deceive the ignorant.
Susan Williams:
>:: You mean like Ted McMillan and me? Why can't you just condemn us in
>:: our entirety? Why make such...
Stephen Quist cut off the statement in his response in order to more
put readers in circles by saying:
>No. I do not believe you wrote that document. Did you?
>
>Steve
Susan Williams:
Again I say,
You mean like Ted McMillan and me? Why can't you just condemn us in
our entirety SINCE YOU OBEYED THE JESUIT OATH AND LIED SAYING THAT WE
STROVE TO CAST ASPERSIONS ON FAITHFUL CATHOLICS??
The Jesuit Oath is known to make a man deadly, mean and without
conscience...
NOWHERE DO WE SEE IT MAKING MEN STUPID UNLESS IT IS WILLINGLY SO!!
In His Grace,
Susan
What are they doing here? Are they really condemning the Jesuit Oath?
Frankly NO! What they are doing is making it look like it’s
condemned, but they are at the same time protecting themselves from
the Inquisition to come. They claim that they condemn EVERY HATEFUL
line in the Jesuit Oath and the Ustashis. The issue then becomes,
WHAT IN THE JESUIT OATH IS HATEFUL, AND WHAT DID THE USTASHIS EVER DO
THAT WAS HATEFUL.
<<<
|
