Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.religion.christian.amish    |    Kickin' it REAL old school...    |    1,739 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 525 of 1,739    |
|    HISTORY OF HEAVEN AND HELL AND ITS to All    |
|    HISTORY OF HEAVEN AND HELL AND ITS SOCIA    |
|    10 Sep 04 21:13:33    |
      [continued from previous message]              illusions. Become desireless, detached and self-abnegating by       offering all your wealth at the feet of the intellectual       priesthoods. Of course such philosophies did not preach that the       world was also illusory for the intellectual priesthoods who       received the offerings - clearly because it was through such ploys       that they were able to achieve their objectives.              In this regard, excessive concern about the future is also a bad       trait of some intellectual priesthoods. The priests have exploited       the common people by infusing imaginary ideas about heaven and hell       into their minds. And at the same time they themselves, persuaded by       that outlook to ignore the past and the present, have also been       harmed. A doctrine that emphasizes an imaginary heaven and hell and       considers the traditions of the past and the solid earth of the       present as false and illusory, is extremely dangerous for society.       One expression of this type of intellectual thinking was the       doctrine of illusion, based on non-dualism, which tried to reject       the existence of livings beings and the world, and accept the       unmanifest Non-Qualified Supreme Entity as the only truth. But all       is relative and the world is a relative truth whose causal root is       the Supreme Cognition.              In places where, for whatever reason, intellectual clashes among the       intellectual priesthoods were not very intense, their philosophy was       very simple. They would say to the people directly, "I am or       represent the angel or incarnation of God. The things I have said       are not the words of a human being but the words of God" or "I have       received the divine revelation that you will eat this and not that,       worship in this way and not that, and offer this to God. If you obey       my commandments God will bless you and you will go to heaven;       otherwise you will be burnt to death in the fire of hell." The       people were fooled this easily.              The intellectual priesthoods used to tempt people with an imaginary       heaven and inject in them the fear of an imaginary hell. In this way       they would accomplish their objectives; their exploitation would       proceed smoothly; and moreover the fear they aroused in people's       minds would turn those people into fanatics.              It is noticeable that in the fanatical religious communities that we       see in the world today, there is very little intellectual clash       among the intellectual priesthoods. However, whenever fanatical       religious communities made systems of social rules and regulations -       in other words, whenever they made some effort to build a social       structure - their social systems would be stronger than those of       societies which followed a subtle philosophical theory or those of       warrior societies. Where there were intellectual clashes among the       intellectual priesthoods, each priest would have his own supporters,       and their different supporters would never think of themselves as       belonging to the same group. As a result those intellectual       priesthoods were unable to build a strong social structure. Though       their philosophies may or may not have had some good in them, the       Buddhists and Hindus were unable to build strong societies because       of their subtle mentality.              Socially, although the priests understand what is going on, they       cannot do anything about it. They look up towards heaven, hoping to       see the arrival of better days. They think, "When will the       downfallen intellectuals, warriors and labourers unitedly save human       civilization from the all-devouring greed of the capitalists. When       will people realize that it is not the desire of providence for some       to exploit others." Due to the utter despair they feel, the       subservient intellectual of the capitalists gradually become       consumed with remorse recalling how they themselves once exploited       others.              If God is considered to be the perfect ideal, it will have to be       accepted that God is always just. Even though God loves everyone, He       punishes sinners. But it can be said that when He punishes sinners,       His aim is not to give them pain but to rectify their behaviour.       This concept of God is the highest concept. If God is considered to       be the Universal Father, He should not have any racial, national or       communal feeling, or any other type of limited feeling. If this is       true, how can the intellectual priesthoods contract that the soul of       a certain dead person will reach heaven?       (HUMAN SOCIETY PART 2, THE INTELLECTUAL AGE)              They say, if there were a heaven a person's body would not contain       solid and liquid factors, but luminous, aerial and ethereal factors       will remain. The enjoyment of heaven is like this.       (THE PSYCHO-SPIRITUAL EVOLUTION OF HUMANS, A'nanda Vacana'mrtam Part       5, 26 November 1978, Bombay)              The intellectual / religious era illustrated self-aggrandisement       without wanting to inquire into the tragic plight of the common       people: the scholarly priests were hardly accessible to the common       people. The innocent masses were busy appeasing the priest with       oblations, honorariums and floral offerings. Where was the time for       them to take of the needy families of the poor neighbourhoods who       were perhaps dying of starvation? And what would be the material       benefit of such an action? Service to the poor would pay nothing, so       let them go to hell, let them die en masse. So nobody had anything       to do with the poor. And anyway, the priests were busy with worship,       prayer and observance of sacraments. All their energies were spent       in the appeasement of the gods and goddesses enthroned in the       temples, churches or mosques. There was simply no opportunity to       inculcate more humane qualities.              According to their intellectual scriptures, a temple made of bricks       and wood was of more value than humanity itself. Suppose an old       beggar, numbed with the cold chill of the night, is standing wearily       in front of a temple, his begging bowl empty. The temple is       reverberating with ringing bells, and the deity is being worshipped       in accordance with the scriptural dictates. While the devotees stand       before the deity with hands folded in reverence, the beggar shivers       bitterly outside. On completing the ritual, the people leave the       temple one by one, followed by the priest. The beggar entreats him       to let him sleep in one corner of the temple, but the priest replies       emphatically, "I can't afford to pollute the temple for your sake."       And the old man has to trudge into the world of uncertainty, and       perhaps bury himself in the coffin of the cold. The sanctity of       inert wood and bricks is valued more than a man's life.       (SOCIAL VALUES AND HUMAN CARDINAL PRINCIPLES, A Few Problems Solved       Part 2, Prout in a Nutshell Part 7, Supreme Expression Part 2, March       1970)              What is the proper approach?              God – the Supreme Consciousness - is the Master of both hell and       heaven. Suppose a wicked man has gone to hell because of his wicked       acts. God will also remain with him there. In no situation is the       wicked man helpless. God will be with him in hell to console him, to       inspire him, saying, `My son, there is nothing to worry about, there       is nothing to be unnerved about. I am with you, go ahead.'              Once a devotee said, `God can send me to hell if He wishes but on       one condition - that He will stay with me there also.'              So, you should be careful. Remember that in no situation are you       helpless, in no situation are you alone. Whether you are intelligent       or foolish, rich or poor, educated or uneducated, you are never       helpless. In no situation do you have to live alone. God - the              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca